California Law Protects Unpaid Interns and Volunteers from Harassment and Discrimination

Jackson Lewis Law firm

California has become the third state in the country, after New York and Oregon, to ban sexual harassment and discrimination in the workplace directed toward unpaid interns.

The new law (AB 1443) extends workplace harassment and discrimination protections under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) to unpaid interns, volunteers, and individuals in apprenticeship training programs. It will go into effect January 1, 2015.

The new law amends current law (Government Code section 12940(c) and (j)) to make it an unlawful employment practice to discriminate against or to harass an unpaid intern or volunteer on the basis of any legally protected classification unless an exception applies, such as a bona fide occupational qualification.

The following classifications are protected in California: race, religious creed, religious observance, color, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, national origin, ancestry, marital status, medical condition as defined by applicable state law, disability, genetic information, military service, military and veteran status, pregnancy, childbirth and related medical conditions. Employers should consider reviewing their policies for compliance with the recent changes in California law.

ARTICLE BY

OF

Supreme Court Declines Review of Intern Compensability Issue

Jackson Lewis Logo

 

While the compensability of time spent in internship programs continues to be an hotly contested litigation issue, the United States Supreme Court has declined an opportunity to provide clarity in this area, denying certiorari to a Florida medical billing intern whose claim was rejected last year by the Eleventh Circuit Kaplan v. Code Blue Billing & Coding, Inc., 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8046 (U.S. 2013).

Perhaps multiple requests for high court review of an appellate decision will be necessary before the Supreme Court addresses the status of interns under the FLSA, as was required before the Court accepted review of the exempt status of pharmaceutical sales representatives.

Article by:

Noel P. Tripp

Of:

Jackson Lewis P.C.