FTC Proposes Amendments to HSR Rules Targeting Certain Pharmaceutical Licensing Arrangements

The National Law Review recently published an article by Robert G. Kidwell and Farrah Short of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. regarding Pharmaceutical Licensing:

 

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently announced proposed amendments to the Premerger Notification Rules (HSR Rules) to clarify reporting requirements under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the HSR Act), for transactions involving the transfer of patent rights in the pharmaceutical industry. The proposed rule is largely a codification of the FTC’s current treatment of exclusive licenses, with one significant change regarding the weight given to manufacturing rights retained by the licensor in pharmaceutical transactions.

The HSR Act requires parties engaged in certain transactions (involving the acquisition of voting securities, assets, or controlling non-corporate interests) to file a notification with the FTC and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ), and to observe the statutorily prescribed waiting period prior to closing. Theacquisition of a patent is treated as an asset acquisition, and thus a potentially reportable transaction under the HSR Act. However, whether the transfer of rightsto a patent is also deemed an asset acquisition commonly involves a complex analysis focused on whether the transferred rights grant the licensee theexclusive right to “make, use and sell.”

Commercially Significant Rights

The proposed amendments would codify the reporting requirement under the HSR Act for any transaction within the pharmaceutical industry that involves the transfer of “all commercially significant rights.” These rights are defined as the exclusive patent rights to use the patent in a particular therapeutic area or in a specific indication within a therapeutic area.

The FTC has defined the pharmaceutical industry for purposes of this amendment by specifying NAICS (North American Industry Classification System) code 3254, which includes medical and botanical manufacturing, pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing, in-vitro diagnostic substance manufacturing, and biological product manufacturing. Importantly, the FTC’s proposed amendments are limited to the pharmaceutical industry and do not change the current HSR Act reporting requirements related to exclusive licenses in other industries.

Retained Manufacturing Rights

Under current FTC practice, transactions where the licensor retains the right tomanufacture are generally deemed non-exclusive and thus non-reportable under the HSR Act, even if the licensee obtains exclusive rights to use and sell under the patent. These transactions historically have been viewed as distribution agreements, rather than asset acquisitions.

The FTC, however, has determined that the right to manufacture in pharmaceutical licensing arrangements is far less important than the right to commercialize (use and sell) the product. Therefore, the FTC’s proposed amendment treats these types of exclusive arrangements in the pharmaceutical industry — where the licensee obtains the exclusive right to use and sell but the licensor retains the right to manufacture — as the transfer of “all commercially significant rights” and thus potentially reportable under the HSR Act. This change would represent a significant departure from the FTC’s current practice.

Retained “Co-Rights”

In certain licensing arrangements, the licensor often retains “co-rights” when granting an otherwise exclusive license. For example, in the pharmaceutical industry, co-rights provide for the shared responsibility between the licensor and the licensee to see the licensed product through the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval process, and the subsequent marketing and promotion of the product (often referred to as “co-development” and “co-marketing” rights). Under current FTC practice, the retention of these co-rights by the licensor does not render the license non-exclusive, therefore they remain potentially reportable licensing arrangements under the HSR Act. The proposed amendments would simply codify this approach without making any change to current practice.

The proposed amendments would modify the HSR Rules contained in 16 C.F.R. §801.1 and §801.2. Click here for the text of the Federal Register Notice, and the full language of the proposed amendments. Comments regarding the proposed amendment must be submitted to the FTC by October 25, 2012.

©1994-2012 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Criminal Tax Fraud and Tax Controversy 2012 – December 6-7, 2012

The National Law Review is pleased to bring you information about the upcoming ABA Criminal Tax Fraud Conference:

When

December 06 – 07, 2012

Where

  • Wynn Las Vegas
  • 3131 Las Vegas Blvd S
  • Las Vegas, NV, 89109-1967
  • United States of America

As in past years, these institutes will offer the most knowledgeable panelists from the government, the judiciary and the private bar.  Attendees will include attorneys and accountants who are just beginning to practice in tax controversy and tax fraud defense, as well as those who are highly experienced practitioners.  The break-out sessions will encourage an open discussion of hot topics.  The program will provides valuable updates on new developments and strategies, along with the opportunity to meet colleagues, renew acquaintances and exchange ideas.

Almost All Applications Filed On or After September 16, 2012 Will Require a New Inventor’s Declaration

On Tuesday, August 14, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a final rule entitled “Changes to Implement the Inventor’s Oath or Declaration Provisions of the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act.” Among other things, this rulemaking implements 35 USC 115, which changed the requirements for the inventor’s oath or declaration. Amended 35 USC 115(b) provides that the oath or declaration must contain two statements: (1) that the application was made or was authorized to be made by the affiant or declarant, and (2) that the individual believes himself or herself to be the original inventor or an original joint inventor of a claimed invention in the application. All oaths or declarations submitted in an application filed on or after September 16, 2012 must meet the requirements of 35 USC 115 as amended by the AIA.

The phrase “or was authorized to be made” is new and does not appear in the current version of the inventor’s declaration. As a result, oaths or declarations submitted in applications filed before September 16, 2012 will not satisfy the statutory requirements for an oath or declaration for an application filed on or after September 16, 2012.

This is especially significant for continuing applications: continuations, divisionals, and continuation-in-part applications. Previously, applicants could submit a copy of the inventor’s oath or declaration from a parent application for a continuation or divisional application of that parent application. However, according to this final rule, starting September 16, 2012, this will no longer be possible if the current oath or declaration does not contain the new statements as above. The oath or declaration that is submitted for a continuing application that was filed on or after September 16, 2012, must satisfy the amended AIA statute. As a result most applications will need a new oath or declaration.

Adding to the problem, the USPTO will no longer review an oath or declaration in an application for compliance with the rules during the examination process. The USPTO will review applications to determine whether the application includes an oath or declaration when the application is in condition for allowance. Therefore it could be many years before the applicant learns that the oath or declaration is defective.

RECOMMENDATION: File continuing applications, continuations, divisionals, and continuation-in-part applications prior to September 16, 2012, if obtaining a new oath or declaration with the signature of the inventors may be a problem. Contact your attorney for other options.

© 2012 Sterne Kessler

Negotiating Business Acquisitions Conference – November 1-2, 2012

The National Law Review is pleased to bring you information regarding the upcoming ABA Conference on Business Acquisition Negotiations:

When

November 01 – 02, 2012

Where

  • Wynn Las Vegas
  • 3131 Las Vegas Blvd S
  • Las Vegas, NV, 89109-1967
  • United States of America

Deferred Action Program Now Implemented by Homeland Security

The National Law Review recently published an article by the Immigration Practice – Mintz Levin of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. regarding the Deferred Action Program:

 

On August 15, 2012, the Obama administration is implementing a new Deferred Action Program that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will administer. This program, which operates as a form of prosecutorial discretion, offers young people who are in the United States with no legal immigration status the opportunity to avoid deportation for at least two years and to gain work authorization.

The program is now open to individuals who(1) were under the age of 31 as of June 15, 2012; (2) came to the United States before reaching their 16th birthday; (3) have continuously resided in the United States since June 15, 2007;(4) were physically present in the United States on June 15, 2012; (5) entered without inspection before June 15, 2012, or had no lawful immigration status as of June 15, 2012; (6) are currently in school, have graduated or obtained a certificate of completion from high school, have obtained a general education development (GED) certificate, or are an honorably discharged veteran of the Coast Guard or Armed Forces of the United States; and (7) have not been convicted of a felony, significant misdemeanor, three or more other misdemeanors, or do not otherwise pose a threat to national security or public safety. DHS published a helpful guideoffering more in-depth guidance on the eligibility requirements for deferred action. The American Immigration Council also provides detailed guidance on eligibility for the program here.

Those individuals who are 15 or older and not in immigration detention may affirmatively apply for deferred action through United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). Last night, USCIS published the Form I-821D, to be used to request deferred action. Applications for employment authorization may be submitted concurrently with the request for deferred action. The cost for both applications is $465, though certain individuals unable to afford the fee may request an exemption.

The executive decision to offer deferred action comes two years after the DREAM Act failed to pass a Senate vote. The DREAM Act would have provided a path to permanent residence for thousands of young people who were brought to the United States as children. This diluted version of the DREAM Act does not provide a path to a green card, citizenship, or any other permanent, legal status in the United States. Decisions on deferred action will be made on a case-by-case basis. Because the process is discretionary, there is no appellate review.

Until the promises of the DREAM Act come before Congress again, Mintz Levin will keep you updated on any developments to DHS’s Deferred Action Program.

©1994-2012 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Rainmaker Retreat: Law Firm Marketing Boot Camp

The National Law Review is pleased to bring you information about the upcoming Law Firm Marketing Boot Camp:

WHY SHOULD YOU ATTEND?

Have you ever gone to a seminar that left you feeling motivated, but you walked out with little more than a good feeling? Or taken a workshop that was great on style, but short on substance?

Ever been to an event that was nothing more than a “pitch fest” that left a bad taste in your mouth? We know exactly how you feel. We have all been to those kinds of events and we hate all those things too. Let me tell you right up front this is not a “pitch fest” where speaker after speaker gets up only trying to sell you something.

We have designed this 2 day intensive workshop to be content rich, loaded with practical content.

We are so confident you will love the Rainmaker Retreat that we offer a 100% unconditional money-back guarantee! At the end of the first day of the Rainmaker Retreat if you don’t believe you have already received your money’s worth, simply tell one of the staff, return your 70-page workbook and the CD set you received and we will issue you a 100% refund.

We understand making the decision to attend an intensive 2-day workshop is a tough decision. Not only do you have to take a day off work (all Rainmaker Retreats are offered only on a Friday-Saturday), but in many cases you have to travel to the event. As a business owner you want to be sure this is a worthwhile investment of your time and money.

WHO SHOULD ATTEND?

Partners at Small Law Firms (less than 25 attorneys) Solo Practitioners and Of Counsel attorneys who are committed to growing their firm. Benefits you will receive:

Solo practitioners who need to find more clients fast on a shoe-string budget. In addition to all the above benefits, solo attorneys will receive these massive benefits:

Law Firm Business Managers and Internal Legal Marketing Staff who are either responsible for marketing the law firm or manage the team who handles the law firm’s marketing. In addition to all the above benefits, Law Firm Business Managers and Internal Legal Marketing Staff will also receive these benefits:

Of Counsel Attorneys who are paid on an “eat what you kill” basis. In addition to all the above benefits, Of Counsel attorneys will also receive these benefits:

Associates who are either looking to grow their book of new clients in the next 6-12 months or want to launch their own private practice. In addition to all the above benefits, Associates will also receive these benefits:

New Global Initiatives to Accelerate Examination of Cleantech Patent Applications

An article regarding Global Initiatives of Cleantech Patents written by Peter A. Jackman and Lori M. Brandes, Ph.D. of Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. appeared recently in The National Law Review:

In an effort to promote the development and commercialization of technologies that conserve natural resources or reduce negative environmental impact, patent offices around the world have adopted programs to expedite the examination of patent applications pertaining to clean technologies.

AUSTRALIA

On September 15, 2009, IP Australia announced a fast-track examination program for patent applications directed to environmentally friendly technologies.  Examination of applications under the program is expected to begin within four to eight weeks after filing the request for expedited examination and no additional fee is required.

BRAZIL

The National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) launched a program on April 17, 2012 to accelerate the patenting of green technologies in alternative energy, transportation, energy conservation, waste management, and agriculture.  The goal of the program is to reduce the average prosecution time of an application from over five years to less than two years.  The program is limited to the first 500 petitions granted and to applications originally filed on or after January 2, 2011 in the INPI or filed as a Paris Convention application in the INPI within one year of a priority application.

CANADA

The Canadian Intellectual Property Office issued an initiative on March 3, 2011 to accelerate the examination of patent applications pertaining to green technology.  Under the initiative, a patent applicant can request accelerated examination by submitting a declaration stating that the application relates to a technology that could help to resolve or mitigate environmental impacts or conserve the natural environment and resources if commercialized, with no additional fee required.

CHINA

Effective August 1, 2012, prioritized examination of applications relating to energy conservation, environmental protection, or green technologies will be available in China.  Applicants must submit a search report by a qualified entity or a translation of a search report issued by another country. Once a request for prioritized examination is granted, a first office action is expected to issue within 30 days and prioritized examination is expected to be completed within one year.

ISRAEL

A new category of applications that could receive priority examination was created for “green patents” by the Israel Patent Office on December 27, 2009.  To request priority examination, the applicant must provide an explanation as to why the invention helps advance environmental protection; however, the declaration and extra fees normally required for priority examination are not required. After qualifying under the program, these “green” patent applications will be examined within three months.

JAPAN

On November 1, 2009, the Japanese Patent Office implemented a program allowing for the accelerated examination of “green inventions” having a beneficial effect on the environment through low energy consumption or reduction of carbon dioxide emissions. Under the program, an applicant can receive a first office action in about two months.

SOUTH KOREA

The Korean Intellectual Property Office launched a fast-track examination program on October 1, 2009 for patent applications related to certain categories of green technologies.  Under this program, an applicant must submit results of a prior art search along with a request for fast-track examination, and a first office action will be issued within one month of the request.

UNITED KINGDOM

On May 12, 2009, the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office created a “Green Channel” program whereby an applicant can request accelerated processing of an application by indicating (1) that the invention relates to a “green” or environmentally friendly technology, and (2) which actions the applicant wishes to accelerate (i.e., search, combined search and examination, publication, and/ or examination).  The program applies to existing applications and applications filed after May 12, 2009.  A searchable public database of published applications in the Green Channel program is available.  As of August 3, 2012, the database contains over 500 applications.

UNITED STATES

The Green Technology Pilot Program for expediting examination of clean technology applications closed earlier this year, with over 1,050 patents issued under the program.  However, other accelerated examination options applicable to all technologies are still available for clean technology applications. These options include the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) Prioritized Examination Program (Track I), the Patent Prosecution Highway, the Accelerated Examination Program, and a Petition based on Applicant’s Age or Health.  Under the Track I program, an application is advanced out of turn for examination upon payment of a $4,800 petition fee, reduced by 50% for qualifying small entity applicants. The USPTO’s goal is to provide a final disposition of a Track I application within 12 months of prioritized status being granted. A maximum of 10,000 requests will be granted  under Track I per fiscal year, and approximately 3,000 have been granted so far in fiscal year 2012.  The average pendency of a Track I application from the grant of a Track I request to the issuance of a first office action on the merits is approximately 1.5 months, and the average pendency from the grant of a Track I request to a final disposition of the application is approximately 5 months.

In view of the numerous international opportunities for accelerated examination and the growing importance of clean technologies, patent applicants should carefully consider these expedited options as part of a global IP strategy to patent their environmental innovations and bring them quickly to market.

© 2012 Sterne Kessler

Retail Law Conference 2012

The National Law Review is pleased to bring you information about the upcoming Retail Law Conference:

at the Westin Galleria in Dallas, Texas

November 7-9, 2012

This event is the perfect opportunity to discuss the latest issues affecting the retail industry while obtaining important continuing legal education (CLE) credits.

Open to retail and consumer product general counsel, senior legal executives and in-house attorneys and their teams, the exceptional dialogue presented at this conference will help your organization navigate the current legal landscape of the industry.

Treasury Department Loosens Up Bonds for Development in Indian Country

An article by Fred Schubkegel of Varnum LLP regarding Development Bonds was recently featured in The National Law Review:

Varnum LLP

The U.S. Treasury Department recently  issued new guidelines for reallocating approximately $1.8 billion remaining in Tribal Economic Development (TED)bonds. In an effort to spur job creation and promote economic growth in Indian country, the new guidelines are more flexible and broaden the scope of activities that qualify for investment.

Originally established by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009, TED bonds gave Indian tribal governments the authority to issue up to $2 billion in tax exempt bonds.  TED bonds can be used for a number of projects, including entertainment venues, energy plants, and hotels. Previously, bonds could be issued only for government buildings. No portion of the proposed bonds may be used for gaming purposes.

The maximum allocation for each individual tribe is 20% of the remaining $1.8 billion balance, or about $360 million. Under the original guidelines, the maximum allocation was limited to $30 million per tribe.  When the authority reaches a $500 million balance, the percentage will no longer apply and the allocation cap will reduce to a maximum of $100 million per tribe.

The most significant change in the guidelines is the emphasis placed on having the project ready to develop and a financing plan in place before applying.  Tribes will have just 180 days to issue the propose bonds after receiving an allocation or risk forfeiting the allocation entirely.

© 2012 Varnum LLP

7th Annual ABA GPSolo National Solo & Small Firm Conference

The National Law Review is pleased to bring you information about the upcoming 7th Annual ABA GPSolo National Solo & Small Firm Conference:

When

October 11 – 13, 2012

Where

  • Westin Seattle
  • 1900 5th Av
  • Seattle, WA, 98101
  • United States of America

The Seventh Annual ABA GPSolo National Solo & Small Firm Conference is an educational and professional forum that will discuss legal developments in the law that impact solo, general practitioners, and small firms.  The conference is designed to engage and inform attorneys at all levels of practice.  Attendees will gain practical knowledge from an expert faculty comprised of well-known nationally acclaimed speakers.

This conference will cover a wide spectrum of topics including Practice Empowerment, Technology, and Basic Skills.

Practice Empowerment topics include:

  • Law firm and client development
  • Unbundling of legal services
  • Mastering the courtroom
  • Ethics 20/20 update
  • Estate planning for same sex couples
  • Persuasive legal writing

Technology programs will explore:

  • Using an iPad in litigation
  • The best apps and technology for your practice
  • Virtual offices and cloud computing
  • The ethics of legal technology
  • Building your practice through technology and advertising

The Basic Skills programs are a must for law students, new practitioners, and those looking to change or expand practice areas. Topics include:

  • Immigration
  • Criminal Law
  • Federal Estate Tax
  • Federal Rules of Evidence
  • Bankruptcy
  • Intellectual Property
  • Real Estate
  • Business Law