Poor Oversight: Healthcare Company & Owner to Pay $1 Million for Care Plan Oversight Service Billing Fraud

The United States announced that Chicago-based healthcare company Apollo Health Inc. (Apollo), and its owner, Brian J. Weinstein, will pay $1 million to resolve False Claims Act allegations. The claims state that Apollo, under the direction of Weinstein, submitted bills to Medicare for services that were never performed. The case was brought by two whistleblowers who will be rewarded for their efforts.

From December 2014 through March 2017, Apollo allegedly submitted Medicare claims for care plan oversight services (CPO) that did not occur. CPOs detail a physician’s duties to supervise a patient receiving complex medical care. Weinstein allegedly directed Apollo to submit 12,592 CPO service claims for over two dozen providers employed by Apollo, despite Weinstein’s knowledge that no services had been rendered to Medicare patients, and no CPO services were documented in medical records.
Medicare fraud undermines the trust and integrity of the healthcare system, resulting in significant financial burdens on taxpayers. When individuals or organizations engage in fraudulent activities, such as billing for services not rendered or submitting false claims, they siphon funds from Medicare’s intended beneficiaries. Medicare fraud diminishes the resources available for legitimate healthcare services for truly ill Medicare beneficiaries.
The settlement resolves claims brought by two whistleblowers, also known as relators, under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. Javar Jones and Louis Curet, the relators in the case, will receive 20% of the settlement amount for bringing the fraudulent activity to the United States’ attention. Whistleblowers who report fraud against the government via a qui tam lawsuit can earn a 15-25% share of the government’s recovery.

Whistleblower to Receive $23 Million in Office Depot Case

Mahany & Ertl Law Firm, Tax and Fraud Practice, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

“Our actions speak louder than words. We are accountable: doing what we say we’re going to do efficiently and on time.” These words come directly from Office Depot’s vision statement, part of the company’s code of ethics. Last week, Office Depot agreed to pay $68,500,000.00 to settle charges that it defrauded California government customers.

Evidently, actions really do speak louder than words!

The suit against Office Depot was originally filed by a whistleblower on behalf of the State of California. By the time it was resolved, over 1000 California cities, counties, school districts and other agencies are eligible to share in the settlement money.

David Sherwin, a former account manager in the company’s business solutions division, originally filed the suit. Sherwin filed his complaint under the California False Claims Act, a law which allows a whistleblower with original knowledge of fraud against the state to file a complaint in the name of the state and keep a percentage of whatever the government collects.

Sherwin claimed that Office Depot was violating pricing agreements negotiated through the U.S. Communities Government Purchasing Alliance, a non-profit organization that helps government agencies get the lowest prices on goods and services. Under the agreement, Office Depot was required to give participating government agencies the same low prices that had been negotiated through the Alliance.

Instead of giving member agencies the lowest prices, Sherwin said that the company sometimes put customers into higher pricing plans without their knowledge and did not drop prices when a more favorable price had been worked out through the Alliance.

Although it agreed to pay over $68 million to settle the charges, Office Depot admitted no wrongdoing and said Sherwin’s claims had “no merit.”

The story has a bittesweet ending in that Sherwin is entitled to $23 million in whistleblower award monies but died only a month after testifying in the case. His estate will receive the award.

This isn’t Office Depot’s first brush with whistleblower suits and fraud allegations. In 2010, the company paid $4.5 million to settle overcharging claims brought by the State of Florida. The company is also reportedly being investigated in New York, Texas and Arizona.

California isn’t the only state with a whistleblower law on its books. A total of 29 states have similar laws, often called False Claims Acts, which allow a whistleblower to keep a portion of whatever monies are collected by the government. To qualify, you must have original source (inside) information about a fraud involving taxpayer funds or a taxpayer funded program. Many of the claims are associated with Medicare, Medicaid, procurement contracts and residential mortgage lending. The latter are eligible for whistleblower awards because the government backs most mortgages.

ARTICLE BY

OF