Tag: USCIS

E-Verify Update and Improvements

Poyner Spruill Law firm

​E-Verify has been operational since 1997 as part of a Basic Pilot Program to assist employers to verify electronically that a newly hired employee is authorized to work in the US.  A number of states have made use of E-Verify mandatory, including North Carolina which requires that employers with 25 employees to have been enrolled in E-Verify by July 1, 2013.

Update

Currently there are over 530,000 employers nationwide enrolled in E-Verify.  Statistically, the program has grown rapidly as has its accuracy, having verified close to 24 million cases.  Of those, 98.81% have been confirmed as employment authorized.  The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) graphic below provides E-Verify’s latest statistics:

E-verify

The Monitoring and Compliance Branch (M&C Branch) was created by the USCIS in 2009 to ensure E-Verify is being used properly.  Its main function is to monitor and guide E-Verify participants by phone, email, desk reviews and site visits.  This unit does not fine employers, but does refer cases of suspected misuse, abuse or fraud to Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE) and the Department of Justice’s Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC).  There has been an uptick in complaints to the OSC resulting in some sizeable settlements.  All settlement agreements described on the OSC website have one thing in common: all employers participated in E-Verify and the OSC became involved, for the most part, by the USCIS referring the employer to OSC.  Thus, it is noteworthy that participation in E-Verify alone does not protect an employer from enforcement action and penalties.

Recent Improvements to E-Verify System

E-Verify has announced some needed improvements to its system to assist employers who, in doing so, will hopefully not attract M&C Branch attention:

  • Duplicate Case alert now notifies the employer if a social security number  matches any other social security number entered for an existing case with the past 30 days.
  • The user’s name no longer auto-fills: it must now be completed each time to ensure accuracy, providing a prompt to validate or update email and phone number whenever the user’s password expires, which is every 90 days.
  • An employee whose information is entered in E-Verify resulting in a tentative nonconfirmation will receive email notification if they provide their email address on the Form I-9.
  • There is a new photo tool that will display any photo on record with E-Verify, enabling the user to compare it to the photo ID being presented.
  • E-Verify now verifies a driver’s license as to authenticity by matching the data entered by the user against participating state motor vehicle department records. Currently, North Carolina does not participate in this so-called RIDE system.
  • If E-Verify detects fraudulent use of a social security number, it prevents that number from being used more than once.
  • Notices generated by E-Verify are now available in 18 languages.
  • There are monthly webinars in Spanish for employers.
  • E-Verify screens for typographical errors and requires employers to correct them.
  • The Further Action Notice that is generated after a Tentative Nonconfirmation from the Department of Homeland Security includes instructions on how to correct immigration records after resolving the Tentative Nonconfirmation on E-Verify.
  • Updated Further Action Notices are also no longer pre-populated, but are easy to complete.
  • Customer support has been improved and includes an “E-Verify Listens” link that can be accessed by the E-Verify user while in the E-Verify system to assist with E-Verify completion.

While the system is not perfect, it is increasingly pervasive and increasingly “user friendly.”  Further, employers have a strong incentive to use E-Verify properly to avoid settlements generated by  enforcement actions that appear to be directly linked to E-Verify misuse, abuse and fraud.

ARTICLE BY

Jennifer G. Parser
OF
Poyner Spruill LLP

Update on USCIS Processing Time for I-526, I-829 and I-924 Petitions

Greenberg Traurig Law firm

On July 17, 2014, USCIS released updated processing times for EB-5 related petitions. The following chart provides the average processing times for cases being adjudicated by the Immigrant Investor Program Office (IPO), as May 31, 2014:

Form Processing Timeframe
as of May 31, 2014

I-526, Immigrant Petition by Alien Entrepreneur

 13.2 months

I-829, Petition by Entrepreneur to Remove Conditions

 7.9 months
I-924, Application for Regional Center 5.4 months

USCIS reminds I-526 applicants that case status can be checked online at www.uscis.gov or through an email to USCIS.ImmigrantInvestorProgram@uscis.dhs.gov.

Article By:

Ali Brodie
Of:
Greenberg Traurig, LLP

USCIS Strictly Enforcing the Statutory Provisions in Adjudicating H-1B Petitions Filed Under the 20,000 Advanced Degree Cap

GT Law

 

A separate cap of 20,000 H-1B’s is allotted for those foreign nationals who were awarded advanced degrees in the U.S. However, not all degrees qualify under this provision. Recently, USCIS has been enforcing this provision very strictly, issuing requests for evidence, denials, and even initiating revocation proceedings for previously approved petitions under the advanced degree cap.

Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 214(g)(5)(c) provides that those foreign nationals who earned a master’s or higher degree from a United States institution of higher education can file under the 20,000 cap, which is separate from the 65,000 cap reserved for all other H-1B petitions, with the exception of colleges, universities, and qualifying affiliated institutions who are exempt from the cap altogether. This section further states that only degrees awarded by those institutions which fit the definition set forth in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)). This section of the law, in turn, defines a U.S. institution of higher education as a public or other non-profit institution accredited by a “nationally recognized accrediting agency or association” or “granted a pre-accreditation status”. Degrees received from institutions which do not fit this definition, though located in the U.S. and award advanced degrees, do not qualify an H-1B petition to be filed under the 20,000 cap.

In the past USCIS has been liberal in reading this section, rarely rejecting filings made under this cap where the foreign national held an advanced degree awarded in the U.S. However, recently, in following its new policy of strict interpretation and observance of the immigration laws and regulations, USCIS has begun to closely scrutinize these filings, issuing requests for evidence, and even denials where it finds that the institution does not fit within the requisite definition to qualify. What’s more, Greenberg Traurig has been informed that USCIS has begun revocation proceedings for previously approved H-1B petitions, where it determined that it previously approved H-1B petitions under the advanced degree cap in error.

This year’s H-1B filings are once again expected to surpass the amount allotted under both caps within the first week, with USCIS conducting a random lottery to choose H-1B petitions for adjudication, similarly to last year. If a petition is filed erroneously requesting adjudication under the advanced degree cap and is rejected by USCIS, with both caps having been exhausted within the first week of the filing season, it is unlikely to be re-filed for the same fiscal year. Therefore, it is very important to provide all of the academic credentials in connection with the H-1B filing to your GT business immigration and compliance attorney and make sure to speak with them about the requirements involved with the H-1B petition cap filings.

Article by:

Nataliya Rymer

Of:

Greenberg Traurig, LLP

Department of State Releases February 2014 Visa Bulletin

Morgan Lewis

 

Bulletin shows no movement of cutoff dates in the EB-2 and EB-3 India categories; the cutoff dates in the EB-2 and EB-3 China categories show minor forward movement with EB-3 China continuing to move ahead of EB-2 China.

The U.S. Department of State (DOS) has released its February 2014 Visa Bulletin.The Visa Bulletin sets out per-country priority date cutoffs that regulate the flow ofadjustment of status (AOS) and consular immigrant visa applications. Foreign nationals may file applications to adjust their statuses to that of permanent residents or to obtain approval of immigrant visas at U.S. embassies or consulates abroad, provided that their priority dates are before the respective cutoff dates specified by the DOS.

What Does the February 2014 Visa Bulletin Say?

At the end of fiscal year 2013, there were considerable advancements in cutoff dates in the EB-2 and EB-3 India categories. In order to regulate the large increase in demand that followed, these cutoff dates retrogressed significantly in December. In January, there was no movement in cutoff dates for the EB-2 and EB-3 India categories; meanwhile, cutoff dates for the EB-3 China category continued to move ahead of those for the EB-2 China category. The February 2014 Visa Bulletin again indicates no movement in cutoff dates for the EB-2 and EB-3 India categories with continued advancement of cutoff dates for the EB-3 China category ahead of the EB-2 China category.

A cutoff date of September 1, 2013 for individuals in the family-based F2A category from Mexico, as well as a cutoff date of September 8, 2013 for individuals in the F2A category from all other countries, remains in effect.

EB-1: Cutoff dates for all EB-1 categories will remain the same.

EB-2: The cutoff date for individuals in the EB-2 category chargeable to India will remain unchanged from last month at November 15, 2004. The cutoff date for individuals in the EB-2 category chargeable to China will advance by 31 days to January 8, 2009. Cutoff dates for the EB-2 category for all other countries will remain the same.

EB-3: The cutoff date for individuals in the EB-3 category chargeable to India will remain unchanged from last month. The cutoff date for individuals in the EB-3 category chargeable to China will advance by 61 days. The cutoff date for individuals in the EB-3 category chargeable to the Philippines will advance by 59 days. The cutoff date for individuals chargeable to Mexico and the Rest of the World will advance by 61 days.

The relevant priority date cutoffs for foreign nationals in the EB-3 category are as follows:

China: June 1, 2012 (forward movement of 61 days)
India: September 1, 2003 (no movement)
Mexico: June 1, 2012 (forward movement of 61 days)

Philippines: April 15, 2007 (forward movement of 59 days)
Rest of the World: June 1, 2012 (forward movement of 61 days)

Developments Affecting the EB-2 Employment-Based Category

Mexico, the Philippines, and the Rest of the World

The cutoff dates for EB-2 individuals chargeable to all countries other than China and India has been the same since November 2012. The February 2014  Visa Bulletin indicates no change to these categories. This means that EB-2 individuals chargeable to all countries other than China and India may continue to file AOS applications or have applications approved through February 2014.

China

The January 2014 Visa Bulletin indicated a cutoff date of December 8, 2008 for EB-2 individuals chargeable to China. The February 2014 Visa Bulletin indicates a cutoff date of January 8, 2009, reflecting forward movement of 31 days. This means that EB-2 individuals chargeable to China with a priority date before January 8, 2009 may file AOS applications or have applications approved in February 2014.

India

Between August and September 2013, the cutoff date for EB-2 individuals chargeable to India advanced by approximately three and a half years. This was followed in December 2013 by retrogression of the cutoff date by three and a half years to November 15, 2004 due to unprecedented demand for EB-2 visa numbers from applicants chargeable to India. The cutoff date remained unchanged in the January 2014 Visa Bulletin, and the February 2014 Visa Bulletin again indicates no change. This means that only EB-2 individuals chargeable to India with a priority date before November 15, 2004 may file AOS applications or have applications approved in February 2014.

Developments Affecting the EB-3 Employment-Based Category

There were significant advancements in cutoff dates for EB-3 individuals chargeable to most countries in the latter half of 2013. In January, the cutoff date for individuals in the EB-3 category from China, Mexico, and the Rest of the World advanced by 183 days, and the cutoff date for individuals in the EB-3 category chargeable to India remained unchanged.

China

From September through December 2013, the cutoff date for EB-3 individuals chargeable to China advanced by 2.75 years. The January 2014 Visa Bulletin indicated a cutoff date of April 1, 2012, reflecting forward movement of 183 days. The February 2014 Visa Bulletin indicates a cutoff date of June 1, 2012, reflecting additional forward movement of 61 days. This means that EB-3 individuals chargeable to China with a priority date before June 1, 2012 may file AOS applications or have applications approved in February 2014. As noted above, this cutoff date remains later than that imposed for individuals chargeable to China in the EB-2 category.

India

In the January 2014 Visa Bulletin, the cutoff date for EB-3 individuals chargeable to India was September 1, 2003. The February 2014 Visa Bulletin indicates no movement of this cutoff date. This means that EB-3 individuals chargeable to India with a priority date before September 1, 2003 may continue to file AOS applications or have applications approved through February 2014.

Rest of the World

From September through December 2013, the cutoff date for EB-3 individuals chargeable to the Rest of the World advanced by 2.75 years. The January 2014 Visa Bulletin indicated forward movement to April 1, 2012. The February 2014 Visa Bulletin indicates a cutoff date of June 1, 2012, reflecting additional forward movement of 61 days. This means that EB-3 individuals chargeable to the Rest of the World with a priority date before June 1, 2012 may file AOS applications or have applications approved in February 2014.

Developments Affecting the F2A Family-Sponsored Category

In October 2013, a cutoff date of September 1, 2013 was imposed for F2A spouses and children of permanent residents from Mexico, and a cutoff date of September 8, 2013 was imposed for F2A spouses and children of permanent residents from all other countries. There was no movement of these cutoff dates in December or January. The February 2014 Visa Bulletin again indicates no movement. This means that AOS applicants with a priority date that falls on or after the applicable September cutoff date will be unable to file AOS applications or have applications approved in February 2014.

How This Affects You

Priority date cutoffs are assessed on a monthly basis by the DOS, based on anticipated demand. Cutoff dates can move forward or backward or remain the same. Employers and employees should take the immigrant visa backlogs into account in their long-term planning and take measures to mitigate their effects. To see the February 2014 Visa Bulletin in its entirety, please visit the DOS website.

Article by:

Of:

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

USCIS Correction: Most Employers Must Complete English Version I-9

Varnum LLP
On March 12, 2013 the USCIS announced the new Form I-9 is available and may be completed in English or Spanish. Today, March 13, 2013, USCIS clarified that Spanish I-9 is available for completion only by Puerto Rico employers.
USCIS incorrectly announced full use during a teleconference but has now clarified onwww.USCIS.gov that the Spanish new form I-9 may not be used by employers (except Puerto Rico employers). Employers may continue to use the Spanish form for reference, but the English version must be completed.

The new Form I-9 is available in English and Spanish. In addition, USCIS has published aHandbook for Employers to provide guidance for completing the new Form I-9.

Employers are required to use the new Form I-9 beginning on May 7, 2013, but it may be used immediately. USCIS will accept prior versions of Form I-9, “(Rev. 08/07/09) Y” and “(Rev. 02/02/09) N”, until May 7, 2013.

Immigration Law Alert – USCIS Extends Form I-9 Validity Period Past Aug. 31, 2012 Expiration Date

On Aug. 13, 2012, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)announced that employers should continue using the current version of the Form I-9 after the form’s expiration date of Aug. 31, 2012. The Form I-9 is the employment verification form designed to help employers verify individuals who are authorized to work in the United States. The current version of the Form I-9 has the expiration date of Aug. 31, 2012 printed in the upper right corner and the revision date of Aug. 7, 2009 printed in the lower right corner.

Previously, on March 27, 2012, USCIS published a proposed revision of the Form I-9 and accepted comments on the proposed form until May 29, 2012. USCIS’s announcement instructing employers to continue to use the current form until further notice indicates that the agency will not publish a final revised Form I-9 before the expiration date of the current Form I-9.

Additional information regarding the new I-9 form will follow as it becomes available.

© 2012 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

Top Ten Trends in I-526 Requests for Evidence

The National Law Review recently published an article by Kate Kalmykov of Greenberg Traurig, LLP regarding I-526 Requests for Evidence:

GT Law

1. Lack of five years of tax returns.  In countries where tax returns are not readily available it is advisable for applicants to provide copies of the relevant sections of the law that explain the tax filing requirements, as well as corroborating evidence from independent third parties such as accountants.  In certain countries employers pay taxes directly on their employees.  In these cases it is advisable that EB-5 investors request this documentation directly from their employer or a corroborating letter attesting to their salary and compliance with the tax filing requirements of their home country.

2. Sale of Property.  USCIS seems to be requesting extensive documentation related to the sale of property if it was purchased less than 7 years ago.  Investors are advised to present sales contracts, deeds, and bank statements showing the sale and transfer of proceeds from the sale of property.  In cases where property was purchased over 7 years ago and evidence is not readily available, as long as a reasonable explanation for the lack of funds is given, USCIS seems to be showing more leniency.

3. Home Equity Loans as Source of Funds.  As the EB-5 program grows in popularity, many investors, particularly those from China have begun to obtain home equity loans for their EB-5 investments.  While investment through loan proceeds are permitted in EB-5, USCIS requires that the Investor prove that they have secured the loan with collateral as well as evidence that they are able to make payments on the loan from a lawful source.

4. Loans from a Petitioner’s Business, another popular source of EB-5 investment funds, particularly with Chinese nationals.  In these cases, USCIS often requests proof of approval from the company’s Board of Directors for issuance of the loan.  Likewise, USCIS requires proof that the investor has the ability to repay the loan.

5. Petitioner’s Salary.  USCIS often requests evidence to show that the investor has a level of income and savings that enables the investor to make the EB-5 investment.  To this end, USCIS may request proof of the investor’s yearly expenses as well as records of ongoing salary.

6. Retained Earnings from Investor’s Business.   Investors must demonstrate that they were allowed access to the funds that they ultimately used for their EB-5 investment and that they had authority to make distributions to themselves.

7. Gift Taxes.  More and more USCIS is requesting proof that the investor has complied with the home country’s gift tax requirements.  Likewise, the giftor must demonstrate their source of funds, as well as their understanding that the gift was made without an expectation of repayment.

8. Use of Intermediaries.  In some countries, like China individuals are restricted in the amount of foreign currency that they can exchange each year.  Where “friends and family” are used to assist in transferring money out of the country, bank statements or currency exchange receipts are often required to demonstrate:

  • Transfers from the investor to the friends and family members
  • Transfers from each friend and family member to the investor’s overseas account
  • Transfer from the Investor to the Regional Center

9. Proof of Common Country Specific Currency Practices.  Many countries operate on a “cash” economy and money is not often deposited in banks.  In these instances, it is important to provide independent, third-party evidence of these practices to account for any “gaps” in the trace of funds.

10. Proof of Source of Administrative Fee.  In addition to the required $500,000 (TEA investments) or $1,000,000 investment amount required by the EB-5 regulations, regional centers often charge a one-time administrative fee ranging from $30,000-60,000 to each investor. EB-5 investors that have been through the process know that the regulations only require that they  demonstrate the source of their EB-5 investment.  Not their entire net worth or earnings over time.  However, USCIS has begun to impose an additional requirement as of late by requesting that investors demonstrate the source and trace of their administrative fee.

©2012 Greenberg Traurig, LLP

USCIS Introduces Redesigned Employment Authorization Document: Form I-766

Recently posted in the National Law Review an article by attorneys Eric S. Bord , A. James Vázquez-Azpiri , Lance Director Nagel, Lisa Stephanian Burton of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP regarding a redesigned Form I-766, Employment Authorization Document:

 

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has released a redesigned Form I-766, Employment Authorization Document, commonly referred to as an “EAD card.” Part of USCIS’s larger effort to eliminate document fraud, the redesign enhances the card’s security features to discourage tampering and misuse. The enhanced security measures include optically variable ink along the top of the card and a holographic image on the front of the card.

How does the redesigned EAD card affect employers’ Form I-9 compliance obligations?

The redesigned EAD card serves the same purpose as the prior version and will remain a “List A” document for employment verification purposes. “List A” documents establish a worker’s identity as well as his or her authorization to work in the United States.

An applicant for employment may still present a valid and unexpired prior version of Form I-766/EAD card to satisfy Form I-9 document requirements. The redesigned Form I-766 will be phased in incrementally. Foreign nationals in possession of the prior version will only receive the redesigned EAD card to replace a lost or stolen card or upon a card’s expiration. A foreign national can apply for a new card no more than 120 days prior to expiration date.

Copyright © 2011 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.