login-customizer domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home1/natiopq9/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131The post Three Ways to Get Lawyers to Fall In Love with Marketing Technology appeared first on The National Law Forum.
]]>Today’s legal industry is hyper-competitive, firms are asking attorneys to learn new skills and adopt new technology like artificial intelligence, eMarketing, or experience management systems. So, lawyers should be eager to embrace any MarTech that could help them gain an advantage, right? Unfortunately, fewer than 40% of lawyers use a CRM, and only slightly more than a quarter of them use it for sales pipeline management.
When considering lawyers’ love/hate relationship with their firm’s marketing technology infrastructure, it is important to consider the lawyer’s perspective when it comes to change management and technology adoption. By nature, lawyers are skeptical, hypercritical, risk-averse, and reluctant to change. These attributes are certainly beneficial for practicing law, but not so much for encouraging marketing technology adoption. This is why it can sometimes feel like you are herding cats, except these cats are extremely smart, have opposable thumbs, and argue for sport.
While lawyers and technology might not seem like a match made in heaven, you can follow these steps to ensure greater adoption and utilization of your marketing technology:
The beauty of technology is that it can do so many things, the problem with technology is… it can do so many things. For technology to succeed it has to adequately satisfy the end users’ needs. Because each firm has its own set of unique needs, technology selection should start with a needs assessment. Interviews should be conducted with key stakeholders to determine your organization’s specific needs and requirements.
As a follow-up to the needs assessment, interview user groups like attorneys, partners and even their assistants, to understand their needs and requirements, and understand their day-to-day processes and problems. These groups each define value differently, meaning that each group will have its own unique needs or set of requirements. Making these users part of the process upfront will increase the likelihood they’ll adopt the technology later on.
Like any good love affair, a successful technology deployment requires extensive communication. Attorneys must be convinced that the technology will not only benefit the firm, but them individually. It can be helpful to take the time to craft a formal communication plan -starting with an announcement coming from firm leadership outlining the system’s benefits. Realistic expectations should be set, not only for the system but also for user requirements.
Next, establish, document, and distribute any processes and procedures necessary to support the implementation. Most importantly, sharing is caring, so always communicate when goals have been reached or solicit feedback from the end users.
All good relationships require attention. Oftentimes, firms forget to account for the long-term costs associated with a technology deployment. For a successful technology deployment, firms must dedicate necessary resources including time, money, and people. It also takes the coordinated efforts of everyone in the firm, so be sure to invite everyone who may need to be involved, such as:
© Copyright 2024 CLIENTSFirst Consulting
by: Christina R. Fritsch JD of CLIENTSFirst Consulting
For more news on Legal Marketing, visit the NLR Law Office Management section.
The post Three Ways to Get Lawyers to Fall In Love with Marketing Technology appeared first on The National Law Forum.
]]>The post #LMA17: Twitter Recap of the Rise of the Legal Marketing Technologist appeared first on The National Law Forum.
]]>
This year’s Legal Marketing Association Annual conference featured a new pre-conference program: Rise of the Legal Marketing Technologist.
The session is designed for looking at a lot of the big picture issues legal marketers face such as artificial intelligence, as well as provide practical advice and tools to help navigate today’s ever changing marketing technology landscape. Here is the National Law Review’s a recap of the Twitter commentary for the day:
Packed house at the first #martech precon at #LMA17
pic.twitter.com/se9AbsRarP
— Rob Kahn (@robkahnca) March 27, 2017
Cognitive systems in law firms can understand, reason, learn and interact. #LMA17 #ai #legaltech pic.twitter.com/2Qe0drVEN0
— Nicole Minnis (@NicoleAngelineC) March 27, 2017
Knowing the individual and organization client gives you a competitive advantage. #LMA17 #ai @LMAintl @IBMWatson https://t.co/ixaJsuuQiD
— National Law Review (@natlawreview) March 27, 2017
Wow. #IBM #Watson: I like how you think. Let me learn to think like you & apply your reasoning elsewhere. #cartridgesOfKnowledge #LMA17 pic.twitter.com/2451DiAV2w
— Klyse Advisory Group (@KlyseAdvisory) March 27, 2017
Was lucky enough to hear Brian Kuhn of IBM Watson talk about cognitive computing at #LMA17. Thought provoking indeed.
— Clint Marcham (@cmarcham1) March 27, 2017
#LegalTech session #2 Microsoft talking about law firms and the cloud AND legal marketing in the cloud! Excited. #lextrack #LMA17
— LexTrack + LexLists (@LexTrack) March 27, 2017
#legaltech Microsoft says more and more law firms and legal departments moving to the Microsoft cloud. #LMA17
— Marsha Redmon (@marsharedmon) March 27, 2017
There’s a high likelihood that a cloud service provider can secure your info better than you can on-premises.
? #lma17 @denniscgarcia
— National Law Review (@natlawreview) March 27, 2017
Most state #Bar opinions approve #cloudcomputing with reasonable #DueDiligence to protect data. #LMA17 @DennisCGarcia @DavidElkanich pic.twitter.com/2K1a1rPPlz
— Klyse Advisory Group (@KlyseAdvisory) March 27, 2017
Twitter not relevant for lawyers? Atty @DavidElkanich of @Holland_Knight: @LMAintl members should encourage use to build name. #LMA17
— Kevin O’Keefe (@kevinokeefe) March 27, 2017
#legaltech West Monroe Partners did marketing automation using Pardot, Salesforce CRM switching FROM InterAtion/Tikit. #LMA17 #LexTrack
— LexTrack + LexLists (@LexTrack) March 27, 2017
To those at the #MarketingAutomation session at #LMA17 – we use Hubspot and have had fantastic results. pic.twitter.com/C32oGBGrTx
— Olivia Cowenhoven (@OCowenhoven) March 27, 2017
Melissa Croteau says it all on not mattering if blogs are on websites, “It’s all just advertising.” Less than 20% trust advertising. #LMA17
— Kevin O’Keefe (@kevinokeefe) March 27, 2017
Automation is only as good as the content you have. @Leahschloss #lma17 #contentmarketing #marketingautomationhttps://t.co/2Um5zo71tn
— National Law Review (@natlawreview) March 27, 2017
Internal duplicate data BIG PROBLEM compete with own pages on your #Website @PlanteMoran #LMA17 https://t.co/BP169OWj3N
— Jennifer B. Schaller (@JeniSchaller) March 27, 2017
Design thinking workshop w @margarethagan of @LegalDesignLab #lma17 #legaldesign #design pic.twitter.com/usloMmcGHr
— National Law Review (@natlawreview) March 27, 2017
#lma17 @margarethagan #design #designthinking Prototypes are key. Too many projects fail too late. Love Love Love. #marketingtechnologist
— Klyse Advisory Group (@KlyseAdvisory) March 27, 2017
Learning about applying design thinking to legal marketing problems w @margarethagan of @LegalDesignLab #LMA17 @LMAintl #legalmarketing pic.twitter.com/IxpLFG4K3t
— Nicole Minnis (@NicoleAngelineC) March 27, 2017
@mmedice @intapp #lma17 How do we define law firm success? Love it. pic.twitter.com/D0PrHK93L7
— Klyse Advisory Group (@KlyseAdvisory) March 27, 2017
Rearchitecting data at the firm is about a client centric system that facilitates the unification of data #DNAofamodernfirm #LMA17 @mmedice pic.twitter.com/ExXw6VqpAr
— Jennifer Roberts (@Jen__Rob) March 27, 2017
@CindyThurston of @Orrick uses data to help achieve the firm’s goals. #LMA17 pic.twitter.com/bZc7hQTPx3
— National Law Review (@natlawreview) March 27, 2017
Get it done! AKA Just do it! #LMA17 @CindyThurston @LMAintl https://t.co/owBi1MMrPI
— Jennifer B. Schaller (@JeniSchaller) March 27, 2017
Using/collecting data: Start w a CRM and make it relevant to lawyers. How? Make them money. Save them time. #LMA17 @GlennHandshake #CRM
— Nicole Minnis (@NicoleAngelineC) March 27, 2017
Stay tuned for more Twitter coverage from the 2017 LMA Annual Conference!
The post #LMA17: Twitter Recap of the Rise of the Legal Marketing Technologist appeared first on The National Law Forum.
]]>