Skip to content
The National Law Forum

The National Law Forum

Legal Updates. Legislative Analysis. Litigation News.

  • About the National Law Forum
National Law Review Legal News Updates

Looking for Something?

What We Cover

  • business
  • Business Development
  • California
  • CLE Events
  • Conferences
  • coronavirus
  • COVID-19
  • Cybersecurity
  • DOJ
  • employment
  • Employment Law
  • environment
  • Environmental Law
  • EPA
  • FDA
  • Finance
  • Financial Services Law
  • FTC
  • government
  • healthcare
  • Health Law
  • Immigration
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet
  • IP Law
  • labor
  • labor and employment
  • Labor Law
  • law firm
  • Law Offce Management
  • legal
  • Legal Events
  • Legal Marketing
  • Legal News
  • Litigation
  • Marketing
  • NLRB
  • privacy
  • Regulatory
  • SCOTUS
  • SEC
  • Social Media
  • supreme court
  • Tax
  • USCIS

Types of Law

What’s Been Posted by Month.

Copyright ©National Law Forum, LLC

  • Today’s Headlines at the National Law Review

Log in

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Subscribe to The National Law Review’s 25+ Newsletters

Newspaper Headline

Categories

SOCIAL MEDIA FROM THE NATIONAL LAW REVIEW

Tag Cloud

  • business
  • Business Development
  • California
  • CLE Events
  • Conferences
  • coronavirus
  • COVID-19
  • Cybersecurity
  • DOJ
  • employment
  • Employment Law
  • environment
  • Environmental Law
  • EPA
  • FDA
  • Finance
  • Financial Services Law
  • FTC
  • government
  • healthcare
  • Health Law
  • Immigration
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet
  • IP Law
  • labor
  • labor and employment
  • Labor Law
  • law firm
  • Law Offce Management
  • legal
  • Legal Events
  • Legal Marketing
  • Legal News
  • Litigation
  • Marketing
  • NLRB
  • privacy
  • Regulatory
  • SCOTUS
  • SEC
  • Social Media
  • supreme court
  • Tax
  • USCIS

Tag: Immigration

EB-5 Program Reauthorization: Proposed Legislative Reforms

Background

Created by the Immigration Act of 1990, the Immigrant Investor Program, more commonly referred to as the EB-5 program, offers foreign investors an opportunity to secure permanent resThe July 2015 Visa Bulletin Brings Little Changeidency in the United States by making a minimum capital investment of $1 million per investor into a New Commercial Enterprise (NCE) that will create at least 10 jobs for US workers. Under the law now, the $1 million investment amount is adjusted downward to $500,000 for an NCE that creates jobs in a Targeted Employment Area (TEA), which is defined as a rural area, or as an area that has an unemployment rate that is at least 150 percent of the national average.

In 1992, in an effort to spur interest in the program, Congress followed up by creating a pilot program that allowed for the establishment of EB-5 Regional Centers, which are private for-profit or government-affiliated entities that receive special designation from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to administer EB-5 investments and oversee job creation. The Regional Center program allows indirect jobs to be counted toward the job creation requirements.

According to USCIS, as of June 1, 2015, the agency had approved more than 700 regional center applications.

More than 90 percent of EB-5 investments are made through Regional Centers, or projects affiliated with Regional Centers. The program has been a success, creating in Fiscal Year 2013 alone more than 41,000 jobs. The program has attracted the investment of more than $4.5 billion in qualified U.S. projects.

Current Reauthorization Legislation

In the current congress, legislation has been introduced in the House of Representatives to make the Regional Center program permanent, and in the Senate to extend the program for five years. Both measures would make reforms to the program, which has faced reports of fraud and abuse, processing delays for developers and investors, and concerns that the benefits of the program are not going toward rural and high-unemployment TEAs.

Congress has reauthorized the Regional Center program five times since its inception in 1993, most recently in 2012 when the program was extended through September 30, 2015. The legislation to extend the program was agreed to in the Senate by unanimous consent and in the House of Representatives in a vote of 412-3.

The same legislation also extended through September 30, 2015 the authorization for the E-Verify Program, the Special Immigrant Non-minister Religious Worker Program, and the Conrad State 30 J-1 Visa Waiver Program.

House of Representatives

In March, Representatives Jared Polis (D-CO) and Mark Amodei (R-NV) introduced H.R. 616, the American Entrepreneurship and Investment Act of 2015, which would make the Regional Center program permanent, while also making reforms and enhancements to the program. Specific reforms include:

  • Improving the definition of TEA designations, by codifying the designation authority, which is done at the discretion of the states, and by lengthening the validity period of TEA designations to two years

  • Increasing the program’s efficiency by requiring that the Secretary of Homeland Security establish a preapproval procedure that enables a Regional Center to seek preapproval of a business plan before seeking project investors

  • Establishing a new requirement that USCIS defer to its prior rulings except in the case of material change, fraud or legal deficiency

  • Enhancing Regional Center transparency and accountability with a requirement that investors comply with federal securities laws and other additional enforceable regulations and laws

  • Providing for an expedited 180-day adjudication process for I-924 or I-526 filings, which can take between 12 and 18 months for approval currently

  • Amending the age determinations for children of EB-5 investors and allowing for concurrent filings by of EB-5 petitions for permanent residence status by immediate family members of principal investors

  • Affirming the applicability of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) to any EB-5 petition

Senate

In June, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Ranking Member Patrick Leahy (D-VT) introduced S. 1501, the American Job Creation and Investment Promotion Reform Act of 2015. The bill would reauthorize the Regional Center program for five years, while overhauling it with oversight tools, security enhancements, and anti-fraud provisions to make the program more transparent. The bill would provide the Department of Homeland Security with the authority for expanded background checks and a more thorough vetting of proposed investments, and would also allow DHS to proactively investigate fraud, here in the United States and internationally, using a dedicated fund that would be paid for by certain participants in the program. Other reforms include:

  • Increasing the required minimum investment amount in a TEA from $500,000 to $800,000, and from $1 million to $1.2 million for non-TEA investments

  • Revising the definition of a TEA to include a rural area, closed military base, or area consisting of a single census track with a unemployment rate that is 150 percent of the national average, but with specific requirements related to the TEA’s location within or outside of a metropolitan statistical area

  • Specifying that indirect jobs can make up no more than 90 percent of all the jobs counted for the purpose of the Regional Center designation

  • Requiring that Regional Centers provide an annual certification that they are complying with program requirements and also that they are in compliance with state and U.S. securities laws

  • Making U.S. citizenship or permanent resident status a requirement for anyone directly or indirectly engaged with operating a Regional Center

  • Limiting the use of gifts and loans as the source of EB-5 investments

  • Allowing concurrent filing of an I-526 petition and I-485 adjustment of status application if a visa number is immediately available, and also specifying that if a parent’s I-829 petition is terminated their child will still be considered a child for EB-5 purposes provided that the child remains unmarried and the parent files a subsequent I-526 petition within one year after the termination of the original petition

  • Introducing new parameters for applying job creation statistics with respect to determining the amount of EB-5 capital that may flow into projects that are also financed by non-alien entrepreneurs and other sources of capital

Outlook

While anything is possible in Congress these days, insiders believe that the House and Senate should be able to work together in a bipartisan, bicameral way to reauthorize the EB-5 program.

Congressional staffers working on this issue anticipate that the House will likely pass a reauthorization on the suspension calendar; although the final bill may not be a permanent authorization as called for in H.R. 616, but could instead be a shorter five or seven year extension. It is possible that the House will not act on reauthorization until late September as the expiration date draws near.

Both Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), a senior member of the committee, are thought to be generally supportive of the Polis/Amodei legislation, but are expected to seek changes to the bill.

In the Senate, the outlook is murkier. As discussed above, Chairman Grassley and Ranking Member Leahy have introduced a five-year extension bill, but Senators Charles Schumer (D-NY), Jeff Flake (R-AZ), and John Cornyn (R-TX), all members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, are thought to favor a reauthorization that is closer to the House legislation.

With limited legislative days left before the program’s expiration on September 30th – the House and Senate are in recess for the month of August and first week of September – the most likely, although not certain, outcome is that Congress will pass some version of the Polis/Amodei legislation (with a limited number of years’ extension, versus being made permanent). We could also see a short-term extension of the program to allow House and Senate policymakers to negotiate a compromise reauthorization bill.

ARTICLE BY Douglas Hauer, Alexander Hecht & R. Neal Martin of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

©1994-2015 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted on July 7, 2015May 19, 2021Author National Law ForumCategories ImmigrationTags eb-5 visa, Immigrant Investor Program, Immigration
US Department of State Visa Systems Continue to Experience Technical Failures

US Department of State Visa Systems Continue to Experience Technical Failures

Expect delays in the coming weeks in US visa and passport issuance.

The US Department of State (DOS) announced yesterday that it is experiencing technical problems with visa issuance at US embassies and consulates around the world. The DOS stated that officials are working “around the clock” to fix the problem, noting that it does not expect to have the problem fixed before next week. The DOS further noted that the system failure stems from a hardware issue that began on June 9 that is preventing the DOS from processing and transmitting biometric data checks at visa-issuing embassies and consulates. Domestic passport operations are functioning, and the DOS continues to issue passports to US citizens with urgent overseas travel needs.

Please be aware that many posts have had to reschedule visa appointments this week as a result of this outage. Urgent medical and other humanitarian cases are being prioritized, along with H-2A agricultural workers.

Be aware that this outage may cause a delay in visa issuance throughout the consular system. Although the DOS expects to fix the issue shortly, the delays may affect visa processing for the next several weeks. Please keep this in mind when making travel plans this summer, and allow for extra time when scheduling visa appointments or requesting visa reissuance by mail.

The DOS will continue to post regular updates on its website.

ARTICLE BY Eleanor Pelta & Eric S. Bord of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Copyright © 2015 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted on June 19, 2015May 19, 2021Author National Law ForumCategories ImmigrationTags DOS, Immigration, visa

The July 2015 Visa Bulletin Brings Little Change

The Department of State’s July Visa Bulletin announced only a few modest changes in employment-based visa processing. Most significantly, the EB-3 subcategory for professionals and skilled workers will become unavailable for the Philippines.

The July 2015 Visa Bulletin Brings Little Change

Additionally, Indian nationals seeking classification under the EB-2 preference category will see no change from the month of June.  Those seeking classification under the EB-3 and other workers categories will see a very small change from January 22, 2004 to February 4, 2004.  This means the government is virtually experiencing a “delay” of 11 years. Priority dates for Chinese nationals share lack of progress.  Individuals under EB-2, advanced only four months to October 1, 2013, while EB-3 and other workers remained the same.

Those individuals who have been impacted by a visa retrogression of any kind are encouraged to check the DOS Visa Bulletin each month in order to see if visa processing dates have moved under their approval category.

Employment-Based

All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed

China – Mainland Born

India

Mexico

Philippines

1st

C

C

C

C

C

2nd

C

10/1/2013

10/1/2008

C

C

3rd

4/1/2015

9/1/2011

2/1/2004

4/1/2015

U

Other Workers

4/1/2015

1/1/2006

2/1/2004

4/1/2015

U

4th

C

C

C

C

C

Certain Religious Workers

C

C

C

C

C

5th Targeted Employment Areas/Regional Centers and Pilot Programs

C

9/1/2013

C

C

C

ARTICLE BY Courtney B. Noce of Greenberg Traurig, LLP
©2015 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted on June 15, 2015May 19, 2021Author National Law ForumCategories ImmigrationTags DOS, Immigration, June Visa Bulletin, Visa Bulletin
SEVIS and SEVP System Outage – J, F, and M Students Travel Warning: Student and Exchange Visitor Information System

SEVIS and SEVP System Outage – J, F, and M Students Travel Warning: Student and Exchange Visitor Information System

The Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) is used by the Department of State and The Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) to monitor nonimmigrant exchange visitors and students during their time in the United States.  SEVIS is a web-based system used for critical processes such as issuance of documentation necessary to obtain visas, payment of fees required to participate in exchange programs, and evidence of maintenance of status required to re-enter the United States after travel.

A SEVIS system update is scheduled to be released on Friday, June 26, 2015.  While the planned update/upgrade will provide improved functionality for users, it will also result in a service outage from 8:00 p.m. EDT Friday, June 26, 2015, to 8:00 pm EDT, Sunday, June 28, 2015.  During the outage it will not be possible to access the system to input and/or update records.  It will also not be possible for immigration officers to verify active SEVIS records.  For this reason, it is recommended that J, F, and M visa holders refrain from non-essential travel requiring their re-entry to the United States during the outage.  Visa holders who must travel during the outage should be prepared for long waits at the airport upon re-entry.  Finally, it will not be possible to pay SEVIS fees necessary for the J visa program.  J visa sponsors are recommending that these fees be paid prior to the outage in order to avoid any delays in proceeding with visa issuance.

ARTICLE BY Courtney B. Noce of Greenberg Traurig, LLP

©2015 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted on June 11, 2015May 19, 2021Author National Law ForumCategories ImmigrationTags exchange student, Immigration, student exchange, visa
Federal Register Announces TPS Extended for Somalia – I-9 Update Temporary Protected Status

Federal Register Announces TPS Extended for Somalia – I-9 Update Temporary Protected Status

As published in the Federal Register on June 1, 2015, Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designation was extended for Somalian nationals currently living in the United States.  Somalia’s TPS extension and re-designation is for an additional 18 months, from September 15, 2015 through March 17, 2017.  This action was taken after the Secretary of Homeland Security determined the ongoing armed conflict in Somalia posed a substantial threat to living conditions in the country.  Employers should alert all company representatives responsible for the completion of I-9 forms about this development.

TPS Extension and Re-Designation

A country can be designated for TPS due to temporary conditions in the country that prevent the country’s nationals from returning safely, or in certain circumstances, where the country is unable to handle the return of its nationals adequately.  Individuals granted TPS benefits are not removable from the United States, can obtain an employment authorization document (EAD) to work in the United States, and may be granted travel authorization to travel outside the United States.  The granting of TPS does not, however, result in or lead to permanent resident status.

Somalia was initially designated under the TPS provisions in 1991, with re-designation in 2001 and 2012.  The announced extension of TPS designation for Somalia for an additional 18 months, from September 15, 2015 through March 17, 2017, allows current TPS beneficiaries from Somalia to retain TPS through March 17, 2017, so long as they otherwise continue to meet the eligibility requirements for TPS.

For individuals who have already been granted TPS under one of the previous designations, the 60-day re-registration period runs from June 1, 2015 through July 31, 2015.  USCIS will issue new EADs with a March 17, 2017 expiration date to eligible Somalia TPS beneficiaries who timely re-register and apply for EADs under this extension.  DHS is NOT granting interim work permission through an automatic extension of work authorization, so applicants should file their EAD renewal applications as soon as possible before their current EADs expire in September 2015.

Certain individuals of Somalia who have never applied for TPS may be able to apply under the late initial registration provisions, as long as they (a) can satisfy one of the late initial filing criteria; and (b) meet all TPS eligibility criteria.

ARTICLE BY Ian R. Macdonald of Greenberg Traurig, LLP
©2015 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted on June 9, 2015May 19, 2021Author National Law ForumCategories ImmigrationTags Federal Register, I-9, Immigration, Somalia, Temporary Protected STatus, TPS
The Supreme Court Takes the BIA to Task – Mellouli v. Lynch

The Supreme Court Takes the BIA to Task – Mellouli v. Lynch

Monday, in an opinion authored by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the U.S. Supreme Court brought a measure of hope to non-citizens facing deportation on the basis of certain minor criminal convictions. In Mellouli v. Lynch, the Court ruled that Moones Mellouli, a lawful permanent resident, could not be removed from the United States on the basis of his Kansas conviction for concealing unnamed pills in his sock.

The Court’s decision took the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) to task for routinely applying inconsistent standards in its decision-making. Under federal law, an individual is subject to removal from the United States on the basis of a state “drug-related” conviction if the controlled substance at issue appears on the federal government’s list of controlled substances. If the controlled substance is on the state list, but not on the federal list, the conviction does not render the individual removable from the U.S.

The BIA applied this standard to drug possession and distribution offenses, but with regard to drug paraphernalia-related offenses, the BIA applied a different standard, subjecting a far greater number of non-citizens to deportation. The BIA’s position was that state drug paraphernalia statutes relate to “the drug trade in general” and therefore relate to any and all controlled substances, whether federally listed or not. In Mr. Mellouli’s case, no controlled substance even figured as an element of the offense of which he was convicted. Yet the BIA ordered him to be deported and the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals denied Mellouli’s petition for review.

The anomalous result of the BIA’s inconsistent interpretations was that a non-citizen who was convicted of possessing a controlled substance not on the federal list would not face removal from the country, but a non-citizen convicted of using a sock to hold the very same substance, would indeed be removed from the country.

Countering the usual deference federal courts give to administrative agency legal interpretations, the Supreme Court properly took the BIA to task for its inconsistent, overbroad and careless reasoning. In so doing, the Court has articulated to those bearing responsibility for removing non-citizens from their homes and families in the United States, that they must exercise restraint and discipline in reaching their decisions.

©1994-2015 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted on June 4, 2015May 19, 2021Author National Law ForumCategories Immigration, Supreme CourtTags BIA, Immigration, supreme court

USCIS Suspends Premium Processing for H-1B Extensions

USCIS has announced that it will suspend premium processing for all H-1B extension petitions between May 26, 2015, and July 27, 2015. It will use this time to implement the Employment Authorization for Certain H-4 Spouses and ensure that these applications for work authorization will be adjudicated in a timely manner.

USCIS

Premium processing allows certain petitions and applications to be expedited. A decision or Request for Evidence (“RFE”) must be issued within 15 calendar days of filing the premium processing request. For this service, USCIS requires a $1,225 filing fee to be included with the petition.

USCIS will continue to process cases filed using premium processing prior to May 26, 2015. If an H-1B extension is filed under premium processing before May 26, 2015, but a decision is not issued within the 15-day period, USCIS will refund the premium processing fee. All other petitions are still eligible for premium processing.

ARTICLE BY Jessica Feinstein of Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2015

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted on May 20, 2015May 19, 2021Author National Law ForumCategories ImmigrationTags H-1B visa, Immigration, Premium Processing, USCIS
DOS June 2015 Visa Bulletin – Department of State

DOS June 2015 Visa Bulletin – Department of State

The Department of State’s June Visa Bulletin on a whole brought relatively few changes of note.

Progress was made in the EB-2 category, where priority dates for Indian nationals advanced six months from April to October 1, 2008. Similarly, Chinese nationals experienced forward movement of one year in priority dates, with the Department of State (DOS) now processing cases with priority dates of June 1, 2013 or before.

The EB-3 category remains virtually unchanged across all areas, with the exception of the Philippines which retrogressed nearly two and half years from July 2007 to January 2005. Filipinos whose immigrant petitions were filed under the EB-3 skilled and professional workers category are now subject to a ten-year retrogression backlog.

In the EB-5 category, Chinese nationals with approved I-526 petitions carrying a priority date of May 1, 2013 or earlier are now current.  Those with later priority dates will have to wait until their number is called and there are no timeline estimates available at this time.

Those individuals that have been impacted by a visa retrogression of any kind are encouraged to check the DOS Visa Bulletin each month in order to see if visa processing dates have moved under their approval category.

DOS Visa Bulletin june 2015

ARTICLE BY Shaun K. Staller of Greenberg Traurig, LLP
©2015 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted on May 15, 2015May 19, 2021Author National Law ForumCategories ImmigrationTags DOS, Immigration, June Visa Bulletin, visa, Visa Bulletin
USCIS Changes Policy on the Use of Loan Proceeds as a Source of Fund

USCIS Changes Policy on the Use of Loan Proceeds as a Source of Fund

During the past two USCIS Stakeholder’s Meetings on EB-5 issues, EB-5 stakeholders, have questioned USCIS on its policy of allowing loans to be a source of an investor’s lawful capital.  For many years, USCIS has allowed investors to secure a loan by a relative’s property, so long as that relative gifted the use of the real property as collateral for the loan.

USCIS, however, has recently changed its policy through the course of adjudicating I-526 Petitions and many stakeholders have reported that I-526 Petitions are being denied when the investor does not wholly own the real property used to collateralize a loan.  Following its April 22, 2015, stakeholders call, USCIS issued a written summary of the Immigrant Investor Program Office’s (IPO) Deputy Chief’s remarks on the issue.  USCIS now is stating that proceeds from a loan may qualify as capital of the investor provided that: (1) the investor is personally and primarily liable for the loan and (2) the value of the collateralized asset actually owned by the investor must meet or exceed the value of the loan.  In practice, many stakeholders are reporting Requests for Evidence (RFEs), Notices of Intent to Deny (NOIDs) and denials of petitions stating that where the investor does not personally own the entire property, it cannot be used as the collateral for a loan.  In other words, USCIS seems to be stating that the investor may only use loan proceeds as a source of funds if the loan is collateralized by the investor’s property and the investor solely owns the property, i.e. not jointly with a third party such as a parent, sibling or child.  USCIS seems to be continuing to approve cases where investor owns the property with his or her spouse.

Unfortunately, not only does this shift in policy change more than a decade of adjudications allowing for these loans to be secured by assets of other individuals, but it also does not square with the statute, the regulations, or immigration precedent decisions, all of which allow such a scenario.  The Immigration and Nationality Act does not require cash invested in an enterprise to be secured by assets of an investor.  In the fact scenario described above, the investor is investing cash, as there is no debt arrangement between the investor and the new commercial enterprise. The Code of Federal Regulations only requires promissory notes contributed as “capital” to the new commercial enterprise to be secured by the assets of the investor.  Binding case precedent, particularly Matter of Izummi, also does not require cash invested to be secured by assets of an investor and define “indebtedness” as a “promise to pay,” i.e. a promissory note between the investor and the new commercial enterprise.  Additionally, the EB-5 Policy Memorandum only requires promissory notes to be secured by assets of the investor.  So long as the investor has demonstrated a lawful loan secured by assets that were lawfully obtained, either by the investor himself or from a giftor, investor should have satisfied the burden of proof that the funds were lawfully obtained capital.

USCIS, however, disagrees with this interpretation.  As a practical matter, it may be best to refrain from filing an I-526 petition where the source of funds is a loan that is secured by an asset that is not owned by the investor until this matter is resolved at a policy level or through litigation with USCIS.

Additionally, USCIS warned that loan agreements that are used as the source of funds often contain a provision that state the loan cannot be used for the purchase of investments or securities.  The IPO Deputy Chief stated that a restriction on the use of proceeds contained in a loan agreement is relevant evidence and will be considered in determining whether the investor/petitioner has demonstrated, by the preponderance of evidence, a lawful source of funds.  The Deputy Director further stated that where the petitioner obtains a loan from a lawful source (such as a reputable bank), the loan proceeds may, nevertheless, be unlawful if the capital was obtained by unlawful means (such as fraud on a loan application).  Accordingly, if a loan contains any restrictions on the use of funds, it is best for the investor to deal with the bank ahead of time to remove any such restriction that may conflict with the stated use of funds of the loan.  Additionally, the investor may get a letter from the bank that issued the loan confirming that the bank knew the investor was using the loan for EB-5 purposes when the loan was extended to the investor.

With this policy change, it is important to carefully examine investor strategy with source of funds documentation.  If an investor chooses to take out a loan for the source of the EB-5 investment, it is important to examine the collateral and its ownership carefully.  Equally important is having the bank’s permission to use the loan as the source of an EB-5 investment.

ARTICLE BY

Jennifer Hermansky
Greenberg Traurig, LLP

©2015 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted on May 13, 2015May 19, 2021Author National Law ForumCategories ImmigrationTags Immigration, stakeholders meeting, USCIS
Canada to Implement Electronic Travel Authorization System

Canada to Implement Electronic Travel Authorization System

Starting in March 2016, Canada will require individuals who may visit Canada without a visa to first obtain approval from its electronic travel authorization system (eTA). Visitors to the United States will recognize eTA as similar to the ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization), which is used by the United States to pre-screen its visa-exempt visitors. Applicants will be able to use the eTA system starting Aug. 1, 2015.

The eTA will only be required for visa-exempt individuals seeking to travel to Canada by air for a short-term visit. Applicants must pay a CAD $7.00 processing fee and the resulting electronic travel authorization will be valid for five years or until the applicant’s passport expires, the eTA is cancelled, or a new eTA is issued. The eTA will include the applicant’s name, date, place of birth, gender, address, nationality, and passport information.

Notably, U.S. citizens are exempt from the eTA requirement, as are individuals who already have a Canadian visitor visa in their passport.

Authored by Rebecca Schechter of Greenberg Traurig

©2015 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted on May 3, 2015May 19, 2021Author National Law ForumCategories Global, ImmigrationTags Canada, Electronic Travel Authorization System, Immigration, Retail Law, Travel VISA Approval

Posts pagination

Previous page Page 1 … Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 … Page 30 Next page
Proudly powered by WordPress
The National Law Forum
Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Twenty Fifteen.
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d