Skip to content
The National Law Forum

The National Law Forum

Legal Updates. Legislative Analysis. Litigation News.

  • About the National Law Forum
National Law Review Legal News Updates

Looking for Something?

What We Cover

  • business
  • Business Development
  • California
  • CLE Events
  • Conferences
  • coronavirus
  • COVID-19
  • Cybersecurity
  • DOJ
  • employment
  • Employment Law
  • environment
  • Environmental Law
  • EPA
  • FDA
  • Finance
  • Financial Services Law
  • FTC
  • government
  • healthcare
  • Health Law
  • Immigration
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet
  • IP Law
  • labor
  • labor and employment
  • Labor Law
  • law firm
  • Law Offce Management
  • legal
  • Legal Events
  • Legal Marketing
  • Legal News
  • Litigation
  • Marketing
  • NLRB
  • privacy
  • Regulatory
  • SCOTUS
  • SEC
  • Social Media
  • supreme court
  • Tax
  • USCIS

Types of Law

What’s Been Posted by Month.

Copyright ©National Law Forum, LLC

  • Today’s Headlines at the National Law Review

Log in

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Subscribe to The National Law Review’s 25+ Newsletters

Newspaper Headline

Categories

SOCIAL MEDIA FROM THE NATIONAL LAW REVIEW

Tag Cloud

  • business
  • Business Development
  • California
  • CLE Events
  • Conferences
  • coronavirus
  • COVID-19
  • Cybersecurity
  • DOJ
  • employment
  • Employment Law
  • environment
  • Environmental Law
  • EPA
  • FDA
  • Finance
  • Financial Services Law
  • FTC
  • government
  • healthcare
  • Health Law
  • Immigration
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet
  • IP Law
  • labor
  • labor and employment
  • Labor Law
  • law firm
  • Law Offce Management
  • legal
  • Legal Events
  • Legal Marketing
  • Legal News
  • Litigation
  • Marketing
  • NLRB
  • privacy
  • Regulatory
  • SCOTUS
  • SEC
  • Social Media
  • supreme court
  • Tax
  • USCIS

Tag: Environmental Social and Governance

Climate Disclosures Continuing to Increase Among Major Companies

Climate Disclosures Continuing to Increase Among Major Companies

According to a recent ESG report from the Conference Board, the number of major companies issuing climate change risk factor disclosures has increased significantly over the past two years. Specifically, of the companies in the S&P 500, only 64.2% disclosed climate change risk disclosures in 2021, but fully 84% did so in 2023. Similarly, over the same time frame, the percentage of companies disclosing climate change risk factors among the Russell 3000 increased from 29.6% to 64.0%. Other relevant ESG factors–e.g., the disclosure of climate change policy, climate change opportunities, or board responsibility for climate-related risks–displayed similar levels of increase over the same time period. Notably, though, the Conference Board also acknowledged that larger companies were more likely to engage in this type of disclosure than smaller companies, and, unsurprisingly, that “[c]limate risk disclosure was most prevalent in sectors with existing regulatory and reputational risks related to climate change, including utilities (93%), real estate (77%), and energy (75%).”

This increase in climate change risk disclosure–even in the absence of action by a national regulator in the United States, as the SEC has still not promulgated requirements for climate disclosures–indicates the appetite for this sort of disclosure among investors despite the lack of a national mandate. (Of course, many of these companies may also be subject to other mandatory disclosure regimes, such as the EU or California.) Still, other types of ESG disclosures or governance changes that are arguably more intrusive remain less common–the number of companies that link executive compensation to carbon footprint and emission reduction performance metrics remains below 50% for the S&P 500 and under 25% for Russell 3000 companies.

While this report contains a significant amount of useful information and statistics, there are certain key take-aways that are readily apparent: (1) the pressure to disclose ESG metrics has increased over time; (2) this pressure exists even without federal regulation; and (3) increasing number of companies are disclosing certain, albeit not all, ESG metrics.

Climate risk disclosures increased in 2022 from the previous year, with S&P 500 companies still the most likely to disclose; specifically, 60% of companies in the Russell 3000 Index still did not report climate risk in 2022, compared to only 26% of companies in the S&P 500. Climate risk disclosure was most prevalent in sectors with existing regulatory and reputational risks related to climate change, including utilities (93%), real estate (77%), and energy (75%). The lowest rates of climate risk disclosure were in health care (15%), communication services (23%), and IT (24%).

©1994-2023 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.
by: Jacob H. Hupart of Mintz
For more news on Company Climate Disclosures, visit the NLR Environmental, Energy & Resources section.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted on December 11, 2023December 11, 2023Author National Law ForumCategories Corporate Social Responsibility, Environmental LawTags business, climate change risk factor, climate disclosures, Conference Board, Environmental Social and Governance, ESG, ESG report, government, legal
Department of Labor Enables Consideration of ESG Factors in ERISA Investments

Department of Labor Enables Consideration of ESG Factors in ERISA Investments

Yesterday, the Department of Labor “released a final rule under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) . . . [that] clarif[ied] that fiduciaries may consider climate change and other environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors when they make investment decisions and when they exercise shareholder rights, including voting on shareholder resolutions and board nominations.”  This rule effectively overturned two rules published in the last months of the Trump Administration, which essentially prohibited the consideration of ESG factors when ERISA fiduciaries made investments or exercised their rights.  In short, the Biden Administration has now enabled investment managers of ERISA funds to consider “factors [that] may include the economic effects of climate change and other ESG consideration on the particular investment or investment course of action.”

This action by the Department of Labor is one of several steps undertaken by the Biden Administration to enable (and promote) consideration of ESG factors, particularly climate-related risks, in the context of financial decision-making.  (The most prominent of these initiatives is the pending SEC proposed rule which would require climate-related disclosures by public companies, and so promote consideration of climate factors by investors due to the availability of this type of information.)  Indeed, as part of the Biden Administration’s broader climate agenda, it has consistently focused on financial decisions as a means to combat climate change, and this latest development fits neatly within that broader framework.

It should also be noted that the timing of this action suggests that the Biden Administration has been emboldened by the results of the 2022 midterm elections to proceed with its climate agenda.  As a parallel point, shortly after the elections, the Biden Administration issued a rule that will compel federal contractors to disclose GHG emissions–this action by the Department of Labor is encompassed within the same overall architecture of initiatives designed to encourage the incorporation of ESG factors into financial decision-making.

With respect to the Department of Labor rule itself, the key point is that ESG factors may now be considered when making an investment decision, without fear of enforcement action (as suggested by the Trump-era guidance). Specifically, the “regulatory text clarif[ies] that a fiduciary’s duty of prudence must be based on factors that the fiduciary reasonably determine are relevant to a risk and return analysis and that such factors may include the economic effects of climate change and other ESG considerations on the particular investment or investment course of action.” (emphasis added)  In other words, the regulation embraced by the Department of Labor expressly contemplates that ESG considerations can be incorporated into financial decision-making because such factors are deemed to have an economic impact.

Notably, the federal government’s embrace of the consideration of ESG factors as part of prudent financial decision-making in the context of investing for retirement, as reflected in this Department of Labor rule concerning ERISA, conflicts directly with initiatives embraced by certain conservative-leaning states, such as Florida, which have prohibited the consideration of ESG factors (albeit with exceptions) in the investment decisions by state pension funds. This move by the Biden Administration reflects and amplifies the partisan divide over ESG, particularly climate risks, that is resulting in conflicting directives to companies across America.

The Department of Labor (Department) is adopting amendments to the Investment Duties regulation under Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). The amendments clarify the application of ERISA’s fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty to selecting investments and investment courses of action, including selecting qualified default investment alternatives, exercising shareholder rights, such as proxy voting, and the use of written proxy voting policies and guidelines. The amendments reverse and modify certain amendments to the Investment Duties regulation adopted in 2020.

 https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ebsa/temporary-postings/prudence-and-loyalty-in-selecting-plan-investments-and-exercising-shareholder-rights-final-rule.pdf

For more Investment Law news, click here to visit the National Law Review.
©1994-2022 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted on November 23, 2022November 23, 2022Author National Law ForumCategories Environmental Law, ERISA, Financial Services Law, Investment, Securities LawTags Biden administration, climate change, department of labor, employee retirement income security act, Environmental Social and Governance, ERISA, ESG investment, investment law, Securities Law
Proudly powered by WordPress
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d