Modest Changes Announced in March Visa Bulletin

Greenberg Traurig

The Department of State’s March Visa Bulletin announced only a few modest changes in employment-based visa processing. Most significantly, the EB-3 subcategory for professionals and skilled workers will advance by six months for “All Other Countries,” with priority dates moving up from Jan. 1, 2014, to June 1, 2014. This brings adjudications under this subcategory just shy of eight months of being current.

Additionally, Indian nationals seeking classification under the EB-2 preference category will rejoice at the 16-month advancement announced for March, moving from Sept. 1, 2005, up to Jan., 1, 2007. Even with this considerable jump, the government is still virtually experiencing a “delay” of eight years. Priority dates for Chinese nationals under EB-2, in comparison, only advanced six months to Sept. 1, 2010.

Processing of petitions under the EB-5 immigrant investor program continue to be current for the time being, however, the possibility of visa retrogression for Chinese nationals remains a looming specter, as Greenberg Traurig reported on an earlier EB-5 Insights blog.

EB Category

All Other Countries

China

India

EB-1

Current

Current

Current

EB-2

Current

9/1/2010

1/1/2007

EB-3 (prof. & skilled workers)

6/1/2014

10/22/2011

1/1/2004

EB-3 (other workers)

6/1/2014

8/15/2005

1/1/2004

EB-5

Current

Current

Current

OF

USCIS to Accept Expanded Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Applications Starting February 18, 2015

Jackson Lewis P.C.

President Barack Obama’s November 20, 2014, Executive Order addressed many significant issues of immigration law and allowed more individuals to qualify under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Consequently, on January 29, 2015, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) announced that it will start accepting applications for expanded DACA beginning on February 18, 2015.  To be eligible to apply for expanded DACA, an applicant must be in the U.S. without lawful status, have entered the U.S. before his 16th birthday, and meet certain other criteria.

In the spring of 2012, then-Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano issued a memorandum on the new Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program as a measure of relief to “Dreamers” when the DREAM Act failed to pass in Congress. Since 2012, DACA has allowed thousands of young people to obtain work authorization and offered safety from deportation.

ARTICLE BY

OF

Business Immigration: 2016 H-1B Cap, You’ve Been Warned, Now Here Are This Year’s Key Dates

Greenberg Traurig Law firm

Fiscal Year 2016 H-1B Cap

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will start accepting new H-1B petitionsfor fiscal year 2016 on Wednesday, April 1, 2015. Employers must immediately start identifying current and future employees who will need to be sponsored for new H-1B petitions.

This chart identifies the absolute latest cut-off dates to file Labor Condition Applications (LCAs) and H-1B petitions for this year’s H-1B quota (H-1B cap).

It is extremely likely that this year’s H-1B quota (H-1B cap) will be met within five business days of it opening and USCIS will then stop accepting new petitions until next year’s H-1B cap, which will open on April 1, 2016. If USCIS receives more petitions than are available in the quota, then a lottery will be conducted to select the petitions that will be processed under the H-1B cap.

Please note that only new H-1B petitions are affected by the H-1B cap; H-1B petitions involving someone who has already been counted against the H-1B cap or who has previously held H-1B status are not affected by the H-1B cap.

H1-B Key Dates

By way of background, U.S. businesses use the H-1B program to employ foreign workers in specialty occupation positions that require theoretical or technical expertise in specialized fields, such as scientists, engineers or computer programmers. The number of initial H-1B visas available to U.S. employers (the H-1B cap) is 65,000, with an additional 20,000 numbers set aside for individuals who have obtained a U.S. master’s degree or higher.

The usage of the H-1B program is strongly connected to the health of the U.S. economy. The rate at which USCIS has received cap-subject H-1B petitions in the past few years has dramatically increased as the economy has improved. For example, last year USCIS received 172,500 H-1B petitions within the first week of filing, requiring a lottery in order to select the petitions needed to meet the regular cap of 65,000 and master’s cap of 20,000. Business immigration practitioners are predicting that this year’s H-1B demand will be even greater than last year (perhaps 200,000 or more filings during the first week of the filing season, April 1, 2015, through April 7, 2015) and as a result more than half of all H-1B petitions filed by employers may be rejected by USCIS due to the randomized lottery system.

Petitions not selected in the H-1B lottery will be rejected. Should such a rejection occur, an affected foreign national seeking immigration and employment authorization sponsorship with an employer will be unable to obtain an H-1B visa until at least Oct. 1, 2016, (with the filing season beginning April 1, 2016). Affected foreign nationals may also be required to forego employment with employers and possibly leave the United States. In such cases employers will need to look at alternative visa options for employees unable to secure an H-1B visa.

Recommended Action

Based upon the above, Greenberg Traurig’s Business Immigration & Compliance group strongly urges employers to file H-1B cap-subject petitions with USCIS on the earliest possible date in fiscal year 2016: mailing of H-1B cap-subject petitions to USCIS on March 31, 2015, for delivery to USCIS on Wednesday, April 1, 2015, the very first day of filing. This will provide the best possible chance for acceptance of the H-1B petition.

It also is recommended that H-1B cases should be initiated immediately. It can take two to four weeks or more to gather all of the necessary information and documentation, and prepare the requisite forms and supporting documentation for filing of an H-1B petition. Required information from the employer will include: (1) job title; (2) job description; (3) job location; (4) minimum education and experience required for the position; and (5) offered wage/salary. Required information from the employee will include: (1) resume; (2) educational documents (diplomas and transcripts); and (3) any documents related to prior or current U.S. immigration status.

ARTICLE BY

OF

Department of State Releases February 2015 Visa Bulletin

Morgan Lewis logo

Cutoff dates in the EB-2 India category advance by six and a half months, cutoff dates in EB-3 for the Rest of the World advance by five months, cutoff dates for China advance by six months, and EB-3 China is still ahead of EB-2 China.

The U.S. Department of State (DOS) has released its February 2015 Visa Bulletin. The Visa Bulletin sets out per-country priority date cutoffs that regulate the flow of adjustment of status (AOS) and consular immigrant visa applications. Foreign nationals may file applications to adjust their statuses to that of permanent residents or to obtain approval of immigrant visas at a U.S. embassy or consulate abroad, provided that their priority dates are prior to the respective cutoff dates specified by the DOS.

What Does the February 2015 Visa Bulletin Say?

The February 2015 Visa Bulletin shows an advance of six and a half months for the EB-2 India category. EB-3 cutoff dates for the worldwide category will advance by five months, and the EB-3 cutoff dates for China will advance by six months.

The cutoff date for F2A applicants from all countries will advance slightly in February.

EB-1: All EB-1 categories will remain current.

EB-2: The cutoff date for applicants in the EB-2 category chargeable to India will advance to September 1, 2005. The cutoff date for applicants in the EB-2 category chargeable to China will advance toMarch 15, 2010. The EB-2 category for all other countries will remaincurrent.

EB-3: The cutoff date for applicants in the EB-3 category chargeable to India will advance by seven days to December 22, 2003. The cutoff date for applicants in the EB-3 category chargeable to China will advance by six months to September 1, 2011, which remains ahead of the cutoff date for EB-2 China. The cutoff date for applicants in the EB-3 category chargeable to the Philippines, Mexico, and the worldwide category will advance by seven months to January 1, 2014.

The relevant priority date cutoffs for foreign nationals in the EB-3 category are as follows:

China: September 1, 2011 (forward movement of 184 days)
India: December 22, 2003 (forward movement of 7 days)
Mexico: January 1, 2014 (forward movement of 214 days)
Philippines: January 1, 2014 (forward movement of 214 days)
Rest of the World: January 1, 2014 (forward movement of 214 days)

Developments Affecting the EB-2 Employment-Based Category

Mexico, the Philippines, and the Rest of the World

The EB-2 category for applicants chargeable to all countries other than China and India has been current since November 2012. The February Visa Bulletin indicates no change to this trend. This means that applicants in the EB-2 category chargeable to all countries other than China and India may continue to file AOS applications or have applications approved through February 2015.

China

The January Visa Bulletin indicated a cutoff date of February 1, 2010 for EB-2 applicants chargeable to China. The February Visa Bulletin indicates a cutoff date of March 15, 2010, reflecting forward movement of 45 days. This means that applicants in the EB-2 category chargeable to China with a priority date prior to March 15, 2010 may file AOS applications or have applications approved in February 2015.

India

The cutoff date for EB-2 applicants chargeable to India advances by six and a half months to September 1, 2005. This means that only applicants in the EB-2 category chargeable to India with a priority date prior to September 1, 2005 may file AOS applications or have applications approved in February 2015.

Developments Affecting the EB-3 Employment-Based Category

China

The January Visa Bulletin indicated a cutoff date of March 1, 2011. The February Visa Bulletin shows a cutoff date of September 1, 2011, an advancement of six months. This means that applicants in the EB-3 category chargeable to China with a priority date prior to September 1, 2011 may file AOS applications or have applications approved in February 2015.

India

The January Visa Bulletin indicated a cutoff date of December 15, 2003. The February Visa Bulletin will advance slightly, with a cutoff date ofDecember 22, 2003. This means that EB-3 applicants chargeable to India with a priority date prior to December 22, 2003 may file AOS applications or have applications approved in February 2015.

Rest of the World

The January Visa Bulletin indicated a cutoff date of June 1, 2013 for EB-3 applicants chargeable to the worldwide category. The February Visa Bulletin indicates a cutoff date of January 1, 2014, reflecting forward movement of 214 days. This means that applicants in the EB-3 category chargeable to the worldwide category with a priority date prior to January 1, 2014 may file AOS applications or have applications approved in February 2015.

Developments Affecting the F2A Family-Sponsored Category

The January Visa Bulletin indicated a cutoff date of February 22, 2013 for F2A applicants from Mexico. The February Visa Bulletin indicates a cutoff date of April 22, 2013, reflecting forward movement of 59 days. This means that applicants from Mexico with a priority date prior to April 22, 2013 will be able to file AOS applications or have applications approved in February 2015.

The January Visa Bulletin indicated a cutoff date of April 15, 2013 for F2A applicants from all other countries. The February Visa Bulletin indicates a cutoff date of May 8, 2013, reflecting forward movement of 23 days. This means that F2A applicants from all other countries with a priority date prior to May 8, 2013 will be able to file AOS applications or have applications approved in February 2015.

Developments in the Coming Months

As noted in last month’s alert, the DOS Visa Office predicts the following movement in the next three months:

F2A Family-Sponsored Category

  • The cutoff date in the F2A category will likely advance by three to four weeks per month.

Employment-Based Second Preference Category

  • The worldwide category will likely remain current.

  • The cutoff date in the EB-2 China category will likely advance by three to six weeks per month.

  • The cutoff date in the EB-2 India category will likely advance by four to six months.

Employment-Based Third Preference Category

  • The cutoff date in the EB-3 worldwide category will continue to advance rapidly for the next several months. Demand is expected to increase significantly, at which point, the cutoff dates will be adjusted accordingly.

  • The cutoff date in the EB-3 China category is expected to advance rapidly in the next few months. Demand is expected to increase and may result in adjustments to the cutoff date within the next six months.

  • The cutoff date in the EB-3 India category will advance up to two weeks.

  • The cutoff date in the EB-3 Mexico category will remain at the worldwide date.

  • The cutoff date in the EB-3 Philippines category will remain at the worldwide date. Increased demand in this category may result in adjustments to the cutoff date later in the fiscal year.

How This Affects You

Priority date cutoffs are assessed on a monthly basis by the DOS, based on anticipated demand. Cutoff dates can move forward or backward or remain static. Employers and employees should take the immigrant visa backlogs into account in their long-term planning and take measures to mitigate their effects. To see the February 2015 Visa Bulletin in its entirety, please visit the DOS website.

ARTICLE BY

OF

It’s H-1B Season! Employers Urged to Begin Preparation of New H-1B Visa Petitions for April 1st Filing

Michael Best Logo

On April 1st each year, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) begins accepting petitions from employers seeking to employ newH-1B workers during the next fiscal year. The number of available new H-1Bs is capped at 65,000 per fiscal year, with an additional 20,000 slots available to foreign nationals holding advanced degrees from U.S. institutions. This fixed number of H-1Bs available per fiscal year is known as the “H-1B cap.”

If, during the first five business days of April, USCIS receives more H-1B petitions than it is allowed to adjudicate, USCIS will randomly select H-1B petitions for adjudication among all of the petitions received during the five-day filing window. In 2014, USCIS received more than 172,000 petitions within the brief filing window; we anticipate that the number of petitions filed during this year’s five-day window will again exceed the H-1B cap. To ensure that H-1B petitions are included within the random selection process, we recommend that employers make hiring decisions for foreign national workers and job applicants as soon as possible and prepare to file petitions for new H-1B employment so that the petitions are received by USCIS on or about April 1, 2015.

In most cases, individuals who currently have H-1B status, whether with you or another employer, need not worry about the annual H-1B cap. However, other individuals, including those who are currently in F-1 (student) or J-1 (exchange visitor) status may need new H-1B petitions filed on their behalf in order to transition to H-1B employment and avoid gaps in employment authorization. Please note that the H-1B cap does not apply to employees of (i) colleges and universities; (ii) nonprofit organizations related to or affiliated with a nonprofit college or university; or (iii) nonprofit or governmental research organizations.

ARTICLE BY

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Extends REAL ID Document Enrollment Dates Affecting State-Issued Driver’s Licenses and IDs

Greenberg Traurig Law firm

Pursuant to its phased implementation of the REAL ID Act, which establishes minimum standards for the production and issuance of state-issued driver’s licenses and identification cards and prohibits federal agencies from accepting non-compliant versions of these documents for official purposes, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recently announced an extension of document enrollment rules. According to current regulations, beginning Dec. 1, 2014, federal agencies may not accept state-issued driver’s licenses or identification cards for official purposes from individuals born after Dec. 1, 1964, unless the license or card is REAL ID-compliant and was issued by a compliant state as determined by DHS. In addition, as of Dec. 1, 2017, federal agencies will be prohibited from accepting any non-compliant documents for official purposes from any individual. Pursuant to this extension, both document enrollment dates have been moved to Oct. 1, 2020.

The implementation of the final rule, which goes into effect immediately, follows a multi-year plan to help budget-strapped states conform their document issuance and production processes to the standards set forth in the REAL ID Act. According to the DHS, this extension was granted due to the agency’s recognition that large numbers of residents from REAL ID Act-compliant states would be required to renew their driver’s licenses or identification cards prior to the end of the year or risk being unable to use them for official federal purposes as of Dec. 1, 2014. This would, in turn, impose significant burdens on compliant states due to the costs and operational difficulties of issuing high numbers of documents prior to the current regulatory deadline. In addition, the existence of two enrollment dates may complicate DHS’ enforcement objectives and diminish the agency’s opportunity to reasonably evaluate the impact of various enforcement phases.

The new rule does not impact the prohibition against federal agencies accepting licenses and identification cards issued by non-REAL ID Act-compliant states.

ARTICLE BY

OF

Holiday Update on USCIS Processing Time for I-526, I-829, and I-924 Petitions

Greenberg Traurig Law firm

Earlier this month, USCIS released updated processing times for EB-5 related petitions.  The following chart provides the average processing times for cases being adjudicated by the Immigrant Investor Program Office (IPO) as of October 31, 2014:

Form

Processing Timeframe as of December 11, 2014

I-526

14.7 months

I-829

8.6 months

I-924

9 months

Based on previously released processing time data issued in July 2014, the current processing time for all three petitions has unfortunately increased.  During the December 5, 2014 EB-5 Public Engagement, Nicholas Colucci, Chief of the Immigrant Investor Program Office, explained the IPO’s operational plan for FY 2015 includes streamlining I-526  petition adjudications on a first-in first-out basis.

USCIS reminds I-526 applicants that tools are available for checking the status of a filing online at www.uscis.gov or through an email to USCIS.ImmigrantInvestorProgram@uscis.dhs.gov for cases which are pending beyond the above referenced processing times.

ARTICLE BY

OF

Department of State Releases January 2015 Visa Bulletin

Cutoff dates in the EB-2 India category remain severely backlogged, cutoff dates in EB-3 for the Rest of the World advance by seven months, cutoff dates for China advance by nine months, and EB-3 China is still ahead of EB-2 China.

The U.S. Department of State (DOS) has released its January 2015 Visa Bulletin. The Visa Bulletin sets out per-country priority date cutoffs that regulate the flow of adjustment of status (AOS) and consular immigrant visa applications. Foreign nationals may file applications to adjust their statuses to that of permanent residents or to obtain approval of immigrant visas at a U.S. embassy or consulate abroad, provided that their priority dates are prior to the respective cutoff dates specified by the DOS.

What Does the January 2015 Visa Bulletin Say?

The January 2015 Visa Bulletin shows no change in the cutoff date for the EB-2 India category. EB-3 cutoff dates for the worldwide category will advance by seven months, and the EB-3 cutoff dates for China will advance by nine months.

The cutoff date for F2A applicants from all countries will advance slightly in January.

EB-1: All EB-1 categories will remain current.

EB-2: The cutoff date for applicants in the EB-2 category chargeable to India will remain at February 15, 2005. The cutoff date for applicants in the EB-2 category chargeable to China will advance to February 1, 2010. The EB-2 category for all other countries will remain current.

EB-3: The cutoff date for applicants in the EB-3 category chargeable to India will advance by 14 days to December 15, 2003. The cutoff date for applicants in the EB-3 category chargeable to China will advance by nine months to March 1, 2011, which remains ahead of the cutoff date for EB-2 China. The cutoff date for applicants in the EB-3 category chargeable to the Philippines, Mexico, and the worldwide category will advance by seven months to June 1, 2013.

The relevant priority date cutoffs for foreign nationals in the EB-3 category are as follows:

China: March 1, 2011 (forward movement of 273 days)
India: December 15, 2003 (forward movement of 14 days)
Mexico: June 1, 2013 (forward movement of 213 days)
Philippines: June 1, 2013 (forward movement of 213 days)
Rest of the World: June 1, 2013 (forward movement of 213 days)

Developments Affecting the EB-2 Employment-Based Category

Mexico, the Philippines, and the Rest of the World

The EB-2 category for applicants chargeable to all countries other than China and India has been current since November 2012. The January Visa Bulletin indicates no change to this trend. This means that applicants in the EB-2 category chargeable to all countries other than China and India may continue to file AOS applications or have applications approved through January 2015.

China

The December Visa Bulletin indicated a cutoff date of January 1, 2010 for EB-2 applicants chargeable to China. The January Visa Bulletin indicates a cutoff date of February 1, 2010, reflecting forward movement of 31 days. This means that applicants in the EB-2 category chargeable to China with a priority date prior to February 1, 2010 may file AOS applications or have applications approved in January 2015.

India

The cutoff date for EB-2 applicants chargeable to India remains at February 15, 2005. This means that only applicants in the EB-2 category chargeable to India with a priority date prior to February 15, 2005 may file AOS applications or have applications approved in January 2015.

Developments Affecting the EB-3 Employment-Based Category

China

The December Visa Bulletin indicated a cutoff date of June 1, 2010. The January Visa Bulletin shows a cutoff date of March 1, 2011, an advancement of nine months. This means that applicants in the EB-3 category chargeable to China with a priority date prior to March 1, 2011 may file AOS applications or have applications approved in January 2015.

India

The December Visa Bulletin indicated a cutoff date of December 1, 2003. The January Visa Bulletin will advance slightly, with a cutoff date of December 15, 2003. This means that EB-3 applicants chargeable to India with a priority date prior to December 15, 2003 may file AOS applications or have applications approved in January 2015.

Rest of the World

The December Visa Bulletin indicated a cutoff date of June 1, 2012 for EB-3 applicants chargeable to the worldwide category. The January Visa Bulletin indicates a cutoff date of November 1, 2012, reflecting forward movement of 153 days. This means that applicants in the EB-3 category chargeable to the worldwide category with a priority date prior to November 1, 2012 may file AOS applications or have applications approved in January 2015.

Developments Affecting the F2A Family-Sponsored Category

The December Visa Bulletin indicated a cutoff date of January 1, 2013 for F2A applicants from Mexico. The January Visa Bulletin indicates a cutoff date of February 22, 2013, reflecting forward movement of 43 days. This means that applicants from Mexico with a priority date prior to February 22, 2013 will be able to file AOS applications or have applications approved in January 2015.

The December Visa Bulletin indicated a cutoff date of March 22, 2013 for F2A applicants from all other countries. The January Visa Bulletin indicates a cutoff date of April 15, 2013, reflecting forward movement of 21 days. This means that F2A applicants from all other countries with a priority date prior to April 15, 2013 will be able to file AOS applications or have applications approved in January 2015.

Developments in the Coming Months

As noted in last month’s alert, the DOS Visa Office predicts the following movement in the next three months:

F2A Family-Sponsored Category

  • The cutoff date in the F2A category will likely advance by three to five weeks per month.

Employment-Based Second Preference Category

  • The worldwide category will likely remain current.

  • The cutoff date in the EB-2 China category will likely advance by three to five weeks per month.

  • The cutoff date in the EB-2 India category will likely remain unchanged.

Employment-Based Third Preference Category

  • The cutoff date in the EB-3 worldwide category will continue to advance rapidly for the next several months. Demand is expected to increase significantly, at which point, the cutoff dates will be adjusted accordingly.

  • The cutoff date in the EB-3 China category is expected to advance rapidly in the next few months. Demand is expected to increase and may result in adjustments to the cutoff date by February 2015.

  • The cutoff date in the EB-3 India category will advance little, if at all.

  • The cutoff date in the EB-3 Mexico category will remain at the worldwide date.

  • The cutoff date in the EB-3 Philippines category will remain at the worldwide date. Increased demand in this category may result in adjustments to the cutoff date later in the fiscal year.

How This Affects You

Priority date cutoffs are assessed on a monthly basis by the DOS, based on anticipated demand. Cutoff dates can move forward or backward or remain static. Employers and employees should take the immigrant visa backlogs into account in their long-term planning and take measures to mitigate their effects. To see the January 2015 Visa Bulletin in its entirety, please visit the DOS website.

ARTICLE BY

A New Judge is in Town to Rule on I-9 Violation Penalties

Greenberg Traurig Law firm

Last week Stacy Stiffel Paddack was announced as the newest Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) at the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO). Judge Paddack will rule on the proper penalty in immigration compliance (Form I-9 violations) cases brought by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Welcome aboard, Judge Paddack.

The statutory range for I-9 violations is $110 – $1100 per defective Form I-9. In calculating the proposed penalty amount for I-9 violations, ICE divides the number of violations by the number of employees for which a Form I-9 should have been prepared to obtain a violation percentage. This percentage is used as a baseline fine amount, with deviations available depending on factors such as whether or not this is the employer’s first offense, size of the employer, and whether unauthorized aliens were working for the employer. ICE applies a mechanical calculation when determining the penalty amount and there is little discretion exercised benefitting the employer. ICE’s standard fine amounts are listed in the table below:

 

Standard Fine Amount

Substantive Verification Violations 1st Offense
$110 – $1100
2nd Offense
$110 – $1100
3rd Offense +
$110 – $1100

0% – 9%

$110

$550

$1,100

10% – 19%

$275

$650

$1,100

20% – 29%

$440

$750

$1,100

30% – 39%

$605

$850

$1,100

40% – 49%

$770

$950

$1,100

50% or more

$935

$1,100

$1,100

OCAHO is not bound by ICE’s methodology, and ALJs like Judge Paddack can consider factors not included in ICE’s chart when determining the proper penalty amount, such as ability to pay the proposed penalty and any deterrent effect of the proposed penalty, and can weigh the different factors unequally. A review of OCAHO decisions reveals that the final penalty amount ordered by OCAHO is often significantly lower than the figure on the ICE penalty chart.

ARTICLE BY

OF

Law Professors’ Letter Advocate that Executive Authority to Extend Deportation Deferrals

Jackson Lewis Law firm

On December 3, 2014, NBC News reportedly obtained a November 3 letter written by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia, Stephen Legomsky, Hiroshi Motomura, and Michael Olivas – four distinguished immigration law professors. The professors did not take a position on who should be included in the President’s executive action, but instead advocate that the President is not limited in using prosecutorial discretion to individuals whose dependents are lawfully present in the United States. The professors further encourage the Administration to consider the “broad prosecutorial discretion grounded in the Constitution and other laws of the United States.”

Interestingly, this letter preceded the President’s announcement and advocates a broader use of prosecutorial discretion than the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel. As discussed in another blog post, 17 states are suing the Administration over immigration executive actions.

Obama’s executive action is of major significance to businesses because it includes development of heretofore unavailable mechanisms for certain individuals to gain lawful employment status as well as addressing issues related to individuals in the US in H-1B and H-4 status, such as work authorization for dependent spouses. The potential   for up to 5 million individuals gaining lawful work status has broad implications for employers who may discover that existing workers are undocumented or have questions about employing workers with temporary work permission.  Employers are cautioned however that implementing regulations may not be issued for several months, so taking a wait and see attitude rather than initiating discussions with their workforce may be the most prudent course at this time.

OF