Skip to content
The National Law Forum

The National Law Forum

Legal Updates. Legislative Analysis. Litigation News.

  • About the National Law Forum
National Law Review Legal News Updates

Looking for Something?

What We Cover

  • business
  • Business Development
  • California
  • CLE Events
  • Conferences
  • coronavirus
  • COVID-19
  • Cybersecurity
  • DOJ
  • employment
  • Employment Law
  • environment
  • Environmental Law
  • EPA
  • FDA
  • Finance
  • Financial Services Law
  • FTC
  • government
  • healthcare
  • Health Law
  • Immigration
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet
  • IP Law
  • labor
  • labor and employment
  • Labor Law
  • law firm
  • Law Offce Management
  • legal
  • Legal Events
  • Legal Marketing
  • Legal News
  • Litigation
  • Marketing
  • NLRB
  • privacy
  • Regulatory
  • SCOTUS
  • SEC
  • Social Media
  • supreme court
  • Tax
  • USCIS

Types of Law

What’s Been Posted by Month.

Copyright ©National Law Forum, LLC

  • Today’s Headlines at the National Law Review

Log in

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Subscribe to The National Law Review’s 25+ Newsletters

Newspaper Headline

Categories

SOCIAL MEDIA FROM THE NATIONAL LAW REVIEW

Tag Cloud

  • business
  • Business Development
  • California
  • CLE Events
  • Conferences
  • coronavirus
  • COVID-19
  • Cybersecurity
  • DOJ
  • employment
  • Employment Law
  • environment
  • Environmental Law
  • EPA
  • FDA
  • Finance
  • Financial Services Law
  • FTC
  • government
  • healthcare
  • Health Law
  • Immigration
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet
  • IP Law
  • labor
  • labor and employment
  • Labor Law
  • law firm
  • Law Offce Management
  • legal
  • Legal Events
  • Legal Marketing
  • Legal News
  • Litigation
  • Marketing
  • NLRB
  • privacy
  • Regulatory
  • SCOTUS
  • SEC
  • Social Media
  • supreme court
  • Tax
  • USCIS

Department of Labor Enables Consideration of ESG Factors in ERISA Investments

Yesterday, the Department of Labor “released a final rule under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) . . . [that] clarif[ied] that fiduciaries may consider climate change and other environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors when they make investment decisions and when they exercise shareholder rights, including voting on shareholder resolutions and board nominations.”  This rule effectively overturned two rules published in the last months of the Trump Administration, which essentially prohibited the consideration of ESG factors when ERISA fiduciaries made investments or exercised their rights.  In short, the Biden Administration has now enabled investment managers of ERISA funds to consider “factors [that] may include the economic effects of climate change and other ESG consideration on the particular investment or investment course of action.”

This action by the Department of Labor is one of several steps undertaken by the Biden Administration to enable (and promote) consideration of ESG factors, particularly climate-related risks, in the context of financial decision-making.  (The most prominent of these initiatives is the pending SEC proposed rule which would require climate-related disclosures by public companies, and so promote consideration of climate factors by investors due to the availability of this type of information.)  Indeed, as part of the Biden Administration’s broader climate agenda, it has consistently focused on financial decisions as a means to combat climate change, and this latest development fits neatly within that broader framework.

It should also be noted that the timing of this action suggests that the Biden Administration has been emboldened by the results of the 2022 midterm elections to proceed with its climate agenda.  As a parallel point, shortly after the elections, the Biden Administration issued a rule that will compel federal contractors to disclose GHG emissions–this action by the Department of Labor is encompassed within the same overall architecture of initiatives designed to encourage the incorporation of ESG factors into financial decision-making.

With respect to the Department of Labor rule itself, the key point is that ESG factors may now be considered when making an investment decision, without fear of enforcement action (as suggested by the Trump-era guidance). Specifically, the “regulatory text clarif[ies] that a fiduciary’s duty of prudence must be based on factors that the fiduciary reasonably determine are relevant to a risk and return analysis and that such factors may include the economic effects of climate change and other ESG considerations on the particular investment or investment course of action.” (emphasis added)  In other words, the regulation embraced by the Department of Labor expressly contemplates that ESG considerations can be incorporated into financial decision-making because such factors are deemed to have an economic impact.

Notably, the federal government’s embrace of the consideration of ESG factors as part of prudent financial decision-making in the context of investing for retirement, as reflected in this Department of Labor rule concerning ERISA, conflicts directly with initiatives embraced by certain conservative-leaning states, such as Florida, which have prohibited the consideration of ESG factors (albeit with exceptions) in the investment decisions by state pension funds. This move by the Biden Administration reflects and amplifies the partisan divide over ESG, particularly climate risks, that is resulting in conflicting directives to companies across America.

The Department of Labor (Department) is adopting amendments to the Investment Duties regulation under Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). The amendments clarify the application of ERISA’s fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty to selecting investments and investment courses of action, including selecting qualified default investment alternatives, exercising shareholder rights, such as proxy voting, and the use of written proxy voting policies and guidelines. The amendments reverse and modify certain amendments to the Investment Duties regulation adopted in 2020.

 https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ebsa/temporary-postings/prudence-and-loyalty-in-selecting-plan-investments-and-exercising-shareholder-rights-final-rule.pdf

For more Investment Law news, click here to visit the National Law Review.
©1994-2022 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Published by

National Law Forum

A group of in-house attorneys developed the National Law Review on-line edition to create an easy to use resource to capture legal trends and news as they first start to emerge. We were looking for a better way to organize, vet and easily retrieve all the updates that were being sent to us on a daily basis.In the process, we’ve become one of the highest volume business law websites in the U.S. Today, the National Law Review’s seasoned editors screen and classify breaking news and analysis authored by recognized legal professionals and our own journalists. There is no log in to access the database and new articles are added hourly. The National Law Review revolutionized legal publication in 1888 and this cutting-edge tradition continues today. View all posts by National Law Forum

Posted on November 23, 2022November 23, 2022Author National Law ForumCategories Environmental Law, ERISA, Financial Services Law, Investment, Securities LawTags Biden administration, climate change, department of labor, employee retirement income security act, Environmental Social and Governance, ERISA, ESG investment, investment law, Securities Law

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: “Red Flags in the Mind Set”: SEC Sanctions Three Broker/Dealers for Identity Theft Deficiencies
Next Next post: Dead Canary in the LBRY
Proudly powered by WordPress
%d