Skip to content
The National Law Forum

The National Law Forum

Legal Updates. Legislative Analysis. Litigation News.

  • About the National Law Forum
National Law Review Legal News Updates

Looking for Something?

What We Cover

  • business
  • Business Development
  • California
  • CLE Events
  • Conferences
  • coronavirus
  • COVID-19
  • Cybersecurity
  • DOJ
  • employment
  • Employment Law
  • environment
  • Environmental Law
  • EPA
  • FDA
  • Finance
  • Financial Services Law
  • FTC
  • government
  • healthcare
  • Health Law
  • Immigration
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet
  • IP Law
  • labor
  • labor and employment
  • Labor Law
  • law firm
  • Law Offce Management
  • legal
  • Legal Events
  • Legal Marketing
  • Legal News
  • Litigation
  • Marketing
  • NLRB
  • privacy
  • Regulatory
  • SCOTUS
  • SEC
  • Social Media
  • supreme court
  • Tax
  • USCIS

Types of Law

What’s Been Posted by Month.

Copyright ©National Law Forum, LLC

  • Today’s Headlines at the National Law Review

Log in

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Subscribe to The National Law Review’s 25+ Newsletters

Newspaper Headline

Categories

SOCIAL MEDIA FROM THE NATIONAL LAW REVIEW

Tag Cloud

  • business
  • Business Development
  • California
  • CLE Events
  • Conferences
  • coronavirus
  • COVID-19
  • Cybersecurity
  • DOJ
  • employment
  • Employment Law
  • environment
  • Environmental Law
  • EPA
  • FDA
  • Finance
  • Financial Services Law
  • FTC
  • government
  • healthcare
  • Health Law
  • Immigration
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet
  • IP Law
  • labor
  • labor and employment
  • Labor Law
  • law firm
  • Law Offce Management
  • legal
  • Legal Events
  • Legal Marketing
  • Legal News
  • Litigation
  • Marketing
  • NLRB
  • privacy
  • Regulatory
  • SCOTUS
  • SEC
  • Social Media
  • supreme court
  • Tax
  • USCIS

Health Reimbursement Accounts (HRAs) Under the Affordable Care Act

Drinker Biddle Law Firm

The Issue:  Can an employer offer employees a health reimbursement account (HRA) under the Affordable Care Act?

The Solution:  Maybe.  As a general rule, employers may only offer an HRA if it is integrated with a group health plan (not individual insurance).

Analysis:  HRAs are employer-funded accounts designed to reimburse employees for out-of-pocket medical expenses.  Employees are not permitted to contribute their own funds, so they are unlike flexible spending accounts or health savings accounts, in which an employee defers a portion of his or her wages into the plan to be used to reimburse co-pays or the employee’s portion of insurance premiums.  Because they are employer-funded, HRAs are considered to be group health plans.

As a group health plan, an HRA is generally subject to the Affordable Care Act (ACA).  Among other things, the ACA contains certain market reforms that create federal minimum requirements with respect to access to coverage, premiums, benefits, cost-sharing, and consumer protections, including a prohibition on annual benefit limits.

By definition, an HRA imposes an annual benefit limit and thus raises the issue of whether an HRA can be offered under ACA.  (The annual benefit limit reform does not apply to a plan that covers fewer than two current employees.  This also means that an employer could maintain a retiree-only HRA without violating the market reform requirements, since it would not cover any current employees.)

Assuming the employer’s health plan does cover its current workforce, it could provide an HRA if this feature is “integrated” with a group health plan because, viewed together, there would be no annual limit.  In other words, the group health plan generally would not be permitted to impose an annual limit.  Even though one element of the health plan, the HRA, itself has a limit, this does not cause the plan to violate the requirement.  (Note, however, that the HRA may not be integrated with individual insurance.)

“Integration” – that is, combining an HRA with general group health plan coverage – requires that covered employees have other non-HRA group health plan benefits.  This can be done either through the plan of the employer that maintains the HRA or the plan maintained by the employer of the employee’s spouse.  The employee must also be given the opportunity to opt out and waive HRA coverage annually.  Additional rules may apply as well.

Employers that currently maintain standalone HRAs should talk to their advisers regarding what changes must be made in order to comply with the ACA.

©2014 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved
ARTICLE BY

Summer Conley
OF
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Published by

National Law Forum

A group of in-house attorneys developed the National Law Review on-line edition to create an easy to use resource to capture legal trends and news as they first start to emerge. We were looking for a better way to organize, vet and easily retrieve all the updates that were being sent to us on a daily basis.In the process, we’ve become one of the highest volume business law websites in the U.S. Today, the National Law Review’s seasoned editors screen and classify breaking news and analysis authored by recognized legal professionals and our own journalists. There is no log in to access the database and new articles are added hourly. The National Law Review revolutionized legal publication in 1888 and this cutting-edge tradition continues today. View all posts by National Law Forum

Posted on October 24, 2014May 19, 2021Author National Law ForumCategories UncategorizedTags ACA, Affordable Care Act, employee, employment, Health Reimbursement Account, HRA, Obamacare

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: California Class Action Suit Alleges LinkedIn Violated Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) By Providing Employers With Reference Reports
Next Next post: 2015 COLAs (Cost of Living Adjustments) for Employee Benefit Plans
Proudly powered by WordPress
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d