James M. Singer of Pepper Hamilton LLP is the featured guest blogger this week at the National Law Review. James provides some great reminders about NDA’s Non-Disclosure Agreements. 
Many business transactions start with a nondisclosure agreement (NDA). Often, one of the first deal points to be negotiated is whose “form” NDA will controls. However, it’s common for both parties to overlook the fact that there is no “one-size-fits all” form NDA.
Before entering into an NDA, each party should examine the terms to ensure that the agreement makes sense for the party’s business. Each party should ensure that the agreement adequately protects its own information, while not going so far as to subject the party to confidentiality procedures that can create issues down the road.
Issues to consider when entering into an NDA include:
- Nature of the disclosure: Are you more likely to be the discloser or the recipient of confidential information? If your client will be a discloser, then a strong agreement may benefit the client. If you will only be the recipient, then you might seek a less stringent agreement.
- Duration of the confidentiality obligation: Some NDAs require information to be kept confidential forever. Others have a more limited term, such as 2 to 3 years. A long term is valuable if the disclosure involves proprietary manufacturing processes, chemical compositions, or similar information. However, if you are disclosing information that will become publicly known anyway — such as design details for a soon-to-be-sold product, or information that will be published in a patent application — then a term greater than 2 or 3 years may only benefit the other party.
- Consistency with corporate procedures: Each party should review the terms of the agreement to ensure that the agreement does impose obligations with which it cannot comply. For example, if you need to disclose the information to contractors who aren’t employees, be sure that the agreement permits that. I’ve also seen NDAs stating that all individuals who will have access to the information must sign a confidentiality agreement that specifically refers to the NDA. Will you require your employees to sign a new agreement that specifically refers to this agreement? When faced with this type of obligation, consider whether or not you are prepared to comply.
- Purpose / Non-use clause: It’s standard for an NDA to prohibit the recipient from disclosing the information. However, does it also restrict the recipient from internally using the information for its own benefit? Does it clearly limit the purpose for which the recipient can use the information? “Purpose” clauses are often filled in after all other terms are negotiated. Parties should take care so that the purpose clause is as carefully drafted as any other clause.
These are just a few areas that parties should consider before signing a confidentiality agreement. Rather than simply signing an ‘off the shelf” form, each party should carefully review the agreement with its attorneys to ensure that the document fits the business need.
Copyright © 2010 Pepper Hamilton LLP
About the Author:
James M. Singer is a partner in the Intellectual Property Practice Group of Pepper Hamilton LLP. A registered patent attorney, Mr. Singer provides strategic counseling that helps businesses identify, acquire, license, protect and maximize the value of intangible assets. Mr. Singer is the author and co-author of several publications, and he publishes IP Spotlight, a blog about topics relevant to the intersection of business and intellectual property law, at http://www.ipspotlight.com/. He also is a frequent public speaker on issues relating to technology and the law, and is recognized in Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) Licensing 250: The World’s Leading Patent and Technology Licensing Lawyers 2010. 412-454-5023 /www.pepperlaw.com
