The National Law Forum

The Blog of the The National Law Review

Category Archives: Intellectual Property

Criminal or Civil Liability for Sharing Streaming Accounts?

We are at the beginning of a new era of media consumption.  Traditional content delivery systems such as satellite and cable television are hemorrhaging customers to a wave of “cord cutting” that has been facilitated by the availability of streaming services such as Hulu Plus, Netflix and HBO Go.[1]  Now that smart televisions are becoming …

Continue reading

Amazon to Control Delivery by Drone?

Drone preparing to fly over the city

People are talking about and news organizations are covering Amazon’s announced plans to deliver goods by drone in the not-too-distant future.  However, fewer are talking about or covering Amazon’s effort to be the only company that can autonomously deliver goods by drone.  On March 25, 2014, Amazon filed a United States patent application directed to …

Continue reading

Top Patent Law Stories In 2015

2015

There was a lot of IP action in 2015 – much involving the Fed. Cir. and Supreme Court’s resolution of cases in progress in 2014. In no particular order, I pick: 1.  Ariosa v Sequenom. This Fed. Cir. decision that a method for isolating “cffDNA” from maternal blood is no more than a natural phenomenon was …

Continue reading

Year End 2015 Update – gTLD Sunrise Periods Now Open

Open hand with projection of URL

New generic top-level domains (gTLDs, the group of letters after the “dot” in a domain name) have launched their “Sunrise” registration periods. As of the date of this newsletter, Sunrise periods are open for the following new gTLDs: .OFFICE .feedback .family .auto .cars .car .lasalle .cloud .wine .vin .theatre .SECURITY .PROTECTION .xn--tckwe (.コム – Japanese for …

Continue reading

Four New Year’s Resolutions to Avoid the Damaging Loss of Trade Secrets

On December 21, 2015, an Illinois jury awarded Miller UK Ltd. $73.6 million against Caterpillar Inc.  Miller supplied couplers for Caterpillar’s equipment, and the jury concluded that Caterpillar used its leverage as Miller’s largest customer to demand access to information that Caterpillar then used to manufacturer its own version of the coupler.  As a result …

Continue reading

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 24,648 other followers