Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) 3.0 Encryption Declared “No Longer Acceptable” to Protect Data

Advertisement

McDermott Will & Emery

On Friday, February 13, 2015, the Payment Cards Industry (PCI) Security Standards Council (Council) posted a bulletin to its website, becoming the first regulatory body to publicly pronounce that Secure Socket Layers (SSL) version 3.0 (and by inference, any earlier version) is “no longer… acceptable for protection of data due to inherent weaknesses within the protocol” and, because of the weaknesses, “no version of SSL meets PCI SSC’s definition of ‘strong cryptography.’” The bulletin does not offer an alternative means that would be acceptable, but rather “urges organizations to work with [their] IT departments and/or partners to understand if [they] are using SSL and determine available options for upgrading to a strong cryptographic protocol as soon as possible.” The Council reports that it intends to publish soon an updated version of PCI-DSS and the related PA-DSS that will address this issue. These developments follow news of the Heartbleed and POODLE attacks from 2014 that exposed SSL vulnerabilities.

Advertisement

Although the PCI standards only apply to merchants and other companies involved in the payment processing ecosystem, the Council’s public pronouncement that SSL is vulnerable and weak is a wakeup call to any organization that still uses an older version of SSL to encrypt its data, regardless of whether these standards apply.

As a result, every company should consider taking the following immediate action:

Advertisement
  1. Work with your IT stakeholders and those responsible for website operation to determine if your organization or a vendor for your organization uses SSL v. 3.0 (or any earlier version);

    Advertisement
  2. If it does, evaluate with those stakeholders how to best disable these older versions, while immediately upgrading to an acceptable strong cryptographic protocol as needed;

  3. Review vendor obligations to ensure compliance with a stronger encryption protocol is mandated and audit vendors to ensure the vendor is implementing greater protection;

  4. If needed, consider retaining a reputable security firm to audit or evaluate your and your vendors’ encryption protocols and ensure vulnerabilities are properly remediated; and

    Advertisement
  5.  Ensure proper testing prior to rollout of any new protocol.

ARTICLE BY

Advertisement
OF

Published by

National Law Forum

A group of in-house attorneys developed the National Law Review on-line edition to create an easy to use resource to capture legal trends and news as they first start to emerge. We were looking for a better way to organize, vet and easily retrieve all the updates that were being sent to us on a daily basis.In the process, we’ve become one of the highest volume business law websites in the U.S. Today, the National Law Review’s seasoned editors screen and classify breaking news and analysis authored by recognized legal professionals and our own journalists. There is no log in to access the database and new articles are added hourly. The National Law Review revolutionized legal publication in 1888 and this cutting-edge tradition continues today.

One thought on “Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) 3.0 Encryption Declared “No Longer Acceptable” to Protect Data”

  1. The problem isn’t about SSL is crippled. We all know that legacy software and protocol are crippled. The problem is to get everyone’s attention and get them migrate to TLS (SSL 3.1). The latter is most difficult. There are still a vast majority of services (from my own research) in US and Canada still rely on legacy system to operate, despise the threat and danger. SSL belongs to one of them. These range from public IoT to governmental system. It also feels like the whole country’s network can collapse anytime because of one or 2 careless sysadmin didn’t keep their system up to date.

    Also, the wrong implementation and deployment of SSL/TLS can eff up your system.

Comments are closed.